LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2019-9579: An issue was discovered in Illumos in Nexenta NexentaStor 4.0.5 and 5.1.2, and other products.

An issue was discovered in Illumos in Nexenta NexentaStor 4.0.5 and 5.1.2, and other products. The SMB server allows an attacker to have unintended access, e.g., an attacker with WRITE_XATTR can change permissions. This occurs because of a combination of three factors: ZFS extended attributes are used to implement NT named streams, the SMB protocol requires implementations to have open handle semantics similar to those of NTFS, and the SMB server passes along certain attribute requests to the underlying object (i.e., they are not considered to be requests that pertain to the named stream).

HighCVSS 8.1Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This flaw can let an authenticated SMB user with extended-attribute write rights change file permissions unintentionally. For affected illumos-based storage systems, limited write access could become access to sensitive files or unauthorized data changes. It is high risk where SMB shares are reachable by untrusted or low-privilege users.

Executive priority

Treat this as a high-priority storage access-control issue if affected SMB shares contain sensitive business data or support many users. Patch planning should be prompt, but current sources do not prove active exploitation.

Technical view

The issue combines ZFS extended attributes used for NT named streams, SMB open-handle semantics, and SMB server forwarding of some attribute requests to the underlying object. A user with WRITE_XATTR can affect object permissions instead of only the named stream, creating unintended access.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely on illumos-derived SMB servers, explicitly including NexentaStor 4.0.5 and 5.1.2. The source says “other products” but does not identify them, so inventory must be vendor-led.

Exploitation context

The CVE is not listed as KEV, and the provided sources do not state active exploitation. Exploitation requires network access to SMB and low-privileged rights, specifically the ability to write extended attributes.

Researcher notes

CWE-276 fits the permission-management impact. The vulnerable behavior depends on SMB named-stream handling over ZFS extended attributes and request forwarding to the base object. Product scope beyond the named NexentaStor versions is incomplete in the provided evidence.

Mitigation direction

  • Check illumos, Nexenta, and Oracle advisories for applicable fixes or supported upgrade paths.
  • Prioritize patching SMB storage systems serving untrusted or broad user populations.
  • Restrict SMB access to trusted networks and authenticated users only.
  • Reduce or remove unnecessary WRITE_XATTR rights on sensitive shares.
  • Monitor for unexpected permission or ACL changes on SMB-hosted data.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory SMB servers built on illumos or NexentaStor.
  • Confirm whether NexentaStor 4.0.5 or 5.1.2 is present.
  • Review vendor patch levels against the cited advisories.
  • Audit shares where users can write extended attributes.
  • Check logs or file metadata for unexplained permission changes.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-276: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2019-9579 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.1 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
3Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.1CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N2.85.2Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

8.1High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2019-9579Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-276 · source CWE mapping

Incorrect Default Permissions

Incorrect Default Permissions represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.