LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2019-6477: TCP-pipelined queries can bypass tcp-clients limit

With pipelining enabled each incoming query on a TCP connection requires a similar resource allocation to a query received via UDP or via TCP without pipelining enabled. A client using a TCP-pipelined connection to a server could consume more resources than the server has been provisioned to handle. When a TCP connection with a large number of pipelined queries is closed, the load on the server releasing these multiple resources can cause it to become unresponsive, even for queries that can be answered authoritatively or from cache. (This is most likely to be perceived as an intermittent server problem).

HighCVSS 7.5Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2019-6477 is a denial-of-service issue in ISC BIND9. A remote client can make a DNS server allocate excessive resources through TCP-pipelined queries, and closing such a connection can leave the server unresponsive. The business impact is DNS instability or outage, not data theft.

Executive priority

Treat this as a high-priority availability risk for DNS infrastructure. It does not indicate confidentiality compromise, but DNS outages can have broad business impact. Patch externally reachable and mission-critical resolvers first, then confirm vendor-managed products are covered.

Technical view

Affected BIND9 versions mishandle resource accounting for TCP-pipelined DNS queries. The tcp-clients limit does not sufficiently bound per-query resource use on one TCP connection. The CVSS 3.1 score is 7.5 because exploitation is network-accessible, unauthenticated, low complexity, and affects availability only.

Likely exposure

Exposure is likely where affected ISC BIND9 releases are reachable over TCP DNS, including recursive, authoritative, or cached-answer deployments. Organizations using vendor distributions or appliances referenced by Synology, F5, Fedora, Debian, or openSUSE should verify their shipped BIND status.

Exploitation context

The provided sources do not show CISA KEV listing or confirmed active exploitation. The issue is still operationally important because DNS services are internet-facing in many environments and outages can disrupt authentication, routing, application access, and customer traffic.

Researcher notes

Evidence supports a resource-exhaustion flaw tied to TCP pipelining and ineffective tcp-clients limiting. The source bundle gives affected version ranges but does not include exploit sightings, exploit code, or a KEV listing. Validate through version and vendor-advisory correlation rather than active probing.

Mitigation direction

  • Apply ISC or operating-system vendor updates addressing CVE-2019-6477.
  • Check Synology, F5, Fedora, Debian, or openSUSE advisories for product-specific guidance.
  • Prioritize externally reachable DNS servers and high-dependency internal resolvers.
  • Monitor BIND resource usage and DNS TCP connection behavior until remediated.
  • Document any compensating controls if immediate patching is not possible.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory DNS servers and products running or bundling ISC BIND9.
  • Compare installed BIND versions against the affected ranges in the advisory.
  • Confirm vendor package changelogs reference CVE-2019-6477 or the relevant BIND fix.
  • Review DNS availability monitoring for intermittent unresponsiveness or resource exhaustion.
  • Verify TCP DNS exposure matches intended network architecture.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
6

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2019-6477 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7.5 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
7Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
7.5CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H3.93.6Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

7.5High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2019-6477Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
ISCBIND99.11.6-P1 -> 9.11.12, 9.12.4-P1 -> 9.12.4-P2, 9.14.1 -> 9.14.7, and versions 9.11.5-S6 -> 9.11.12-S1 of BIND 9 Supported Preview Edition. Versions 9.15.0 -> 9.15.5 of the BIND 9.15 development branch are also affectedListed
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.