LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2019-25723: Dräger Perseus A500 2.00-2.02 DoS via Medibus Interface

Dräger Perseus A500 software versions 2.00 through 2.02 contains an improper input handling vulnerability that allows external attackers to cause a denial of service by sending specifically crafted non-Medibus-compliant data through the Medibus interface. Attackers can overload the internal processor with malformed data to trigger a warm restart, causing ventilation pressure to drop to ambient level and interrupting ventilation for several seconds before therapy resumes.

MediumCVSS 6.3Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This flaw can make a Dräger Perseus A500 anesthesia workstation restart when malformed data reaches its Medibus interface. During the restart, ventilation pressure can drop to ambient level and ventilation can pause for several seconds before therapy resumes. The business concern is patient-care disruption, not data theft.

Executive priority

Prioritize clinical inventory and exposure reduction in operating-room or anesthesia environments. This is not reported as actively exploited, but the patient-care consequence makes validation important.

Technical view

CVE-2019-25723 is improper input handling in Dräger Perseus A500 software 2.00 through 2.02, with source data also listing 2.03. Crafted non-Medibus-compliant data sent through the Medibus interface can overload the internal processor and trigger a warm restart, causing temporary ventilation interruption. CVSS v4.0 score is 6.3.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely in clinical environments running affected Perseus A500 systems where the Medibus interface is connected and reachable by untrusted or insufficiently controlled devices or networks.

Exploitation context

The provided sources do not show CISA KEV listing or active exploitation. The issue is remotely reachable per the CVSS vector, but attack complexity is high and impact is availability-focused.

Researcher notes

There is a version inconsistency in the supplied bundle: the description says 2.00 through 2.02, while the affected list includes 2.03. Treat 2.03 as needing vendor confirmation before excluding it.

Mitigation direction

  • Review the Dräger advisory for supported remediation guidance.
  • Confirm affected software versions with biomedical engineering or Dräger support.
  • Restrict untrusted access to the Medibus interface.
  • Segment clinical device networks from general-purpose networks.
  • Monitor for unexpected warm restarts or ventilation interruptions.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Perseus A500 devices and installed software versions.
  • Identify whether the Medibus interface is enabled and connected.
  • Map systems or networks that can reach the Medibus interface.
  • Check device logs or clinical reports for unexplained warm restarts.
  • Verify remediation status against Dräger guidance.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-1286: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2019-25723 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
6.3 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:L

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

2CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
3Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

2 official scores

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
6.3CVSS 4.0MediumCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:LVulnCheck
4CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:L2.21.4VulnCheck

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

6.3Medium
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2019-25723Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:L

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
DrägerPerseus A5002.00, 2.01, 2.02, 2.03unknown
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-1286 · source CWE mapping

Improper Validation of Syntactic Correctness of Input

Improper Validation of Syntactic Correctness of Input represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.