LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2019-25720: Dräger SC Monitoring Devices DoS via Malformed Network Packet

Dräger SC Monitoring devices (SC 6002XL, SC 6802XL, SC 7000, SC 8000, SC 9000 XL) contain a denial-of-service vulnerability in all software versions that allows unauthenticated attackers to reboot the monitor by sending a malformed network packet. Attackers can repeatedly send such malformed packets to disrupt patient monitoring until the device falls back to default configuration and loses network connectivity.

HighCVSS 7.1Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

Affected Dräger SC patient monitoring devices can be forced to reboot by an unauthenticated attacker on a reachable network. Repeated malformed packets may disrupt patient monitoring until devices fall back to default configuration and lose network connectivity. This is a patient-care availability risk, not a data theft issue based on the provided sources.

Executive priority

Treat as high priority for hospitals or care environments using these monitors. The business issue is patient monitoring availability and operational continuity, not confidentiality. Prioritize inventory, vendor engagement, and clinical risk review before making network changes.

Technical view

CVE-2019-25720 affects Dräger SC 6002XL, SC 6802XL, SC 7000, SC 8000, and SC 9000 XL devices, reportedly in all software versions. The issue is CWE-1286 and has CVSS v4.0 score 7.1, with adjacent-network attack vector, low complexity, no privileges, no user interaction, and high availability impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is highest where affected monitors are reachable from clinical networks, shared hospital LANs, or compromised adjacent systems. The provided CVSS vector indicates adjacent-network access, not direct internet attack. Organizations using these legacy Dräger SC monitors should assume network-reachable units are potentially exposed until verified.

Exploitation context

CISA KEV status is false in the provided data. The sources do not state active exploitation in the wild. The described impact is denial of service through malformed network packets, and repeated traffic can prolong disruption to patient monitoring and network connectivity.

Researcher notes

The record describes a network-triggered unauthenticated denial of service with adjacent attack vector and high availability impact. Evidence in the bundle does not identify a patch, public exploitation, or internet-scale exposure. Product naming has minor inconsistencies in the source bundle; verify exact models against the Dräger advisory.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory Dräger SC 6002XL, SC 6802XL, SC 7000, SC 8000, and SC 9000 XL devices.
  • Review the Dräger advisory and contact Dräger for current remediation or compensating guidance.
  • Restrict unnecessary network reachability to affected monitoring devices where clinically feasible.
  • Coordinate any changes with biomedical engineering and clinical operations.
  • Ensure downtime procedures exist for patient monitoring disruption.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether affected Dräger SC models are deployed in clinical environments.
  • Verify software and configuration status against Dräger guidance.
  • Map network paths that can reach affected monitors.
  • Check monitoring and incident logs for unexpected reboots or connectivity loss.
  • Validate compensating controls without disrupting patient care.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-1286: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2019-25720 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7.1 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

2CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
3Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

2 official scores

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
7.1CVSS 4.0HighCVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:NVulnCheck
6.5CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H2.83.6VulnCheck

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

7.1High
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2019-25720Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
DrägerSC 6002XLSC 6002XLunknown
DrägerSC6802XLSC6802XLunknown
DrägerSC 7000SC 7000unknown
DrägerSC8000SC8000unknown
DrägerSC90000 XLSC90000 XLunknown
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-1286 · source CWE mapping

Improper Validation of Syntactic Correctness of Input

Improper Validation of Syntactic Correctness of Input represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.