LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2019-25447: OrientDB 3.0.17 Cross-Site Request Forgery

OrientDB 3.0.17 GA Community Edition contains cross-site request forgery vulnerabilities that allow attackers to perform unauthorized actions by crafting malicious requests to endpoints like /database/, /command/, and /document/. Attackers can create or delete databases, modify schema classes, manage users, and create functions by sending authenticated requests without token validation, combined with reflected and stored cross-site scripting vulnerabilities in the web interface.

MediumCVSS 5.3Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

OrientDB 3.0.17 GA Community Edition has cross-site request forgery weaknesses in its web interface. If an authenticated user is tricked into interacting with attacker-controlled content, unauthorized database administration actions may be submitted. The business risk is unauthorized database, schema, user, or function changes where this version is used.

Executive priority

Treat as a moderate priority for teams using OrientDB 3.0.17. Prioritize internet-exposed or broadly accessible administrative interfaces. The main concern is unauthorized administrative change, not evidence of active mass exploitation from the provided sources.

Technical view

The CVE describes missing token validation affecting OrientDB endpoints including /database/, /command/, and /document/. Reported impact includes creating or deleting databases, modifying schema classes, managing users, and creating functions. The report also notes reflected and stored XSS in the web interface. CVSS v4.0 score is 5.3, severity medium.

Likely exposure

Exposure is likely limited to environments running OrientDB 3.0.17 GA Community Edition, especially where the web interface is reachable by administrators or database users. Risk increases if authenticated users can be socially engineered or if the interface is exposed beyond trusted networks.

Exploitation context

A public Exploit-DB entry is referenced, but the provided sources do not show CISA KEV listing or confirmed active exploitation. Exploitation requires an authenticated request context according to the CVSS vector and description. The issue is not described as unauthenticated remote compromise.

Researcher notes

Evidence is based on the CVE record, VulnCheck advisory, and a referenced Exploit-DB entry. The sources identify affected version 3.0.17 but do not provide a named fixed release in the supplied bundle. Avoid assuming other OrientDB versions are affected without vendor confirmation.

Mitigation direction

  • Identify and prioritize any OrientDB 3.0.17 GA Community Edition instances.
  • Check OrientDB vendor guidance for fixed versions or recommended remediation.
  • Restrict OrientDB web interface access to trusted administrative networks.
  • Limit administrative privileges for routine OrientDB users.
  • Warn administrators not to browse untrusted sites while authenticated to OrientDB.
  • Review exposure of affected endpoints and disable unnecessary web access where possible.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm OrientDB product and version on all database hosts.
  • Determine whether the web interface is enabled and network-reachable.
  • Review user roles with database, schema, user, or function management privileges.
  • Check audit logs for unexpected database, schema, user, or function changes.
  • Verify whether vendor remediation has been applied once guidance is identified.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-352: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Credential and access behavior lookup

The CVE wording references authentication or credential exposure, so valid-account and credential-access review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Database behavior lookup

The CVE wording references database injection or access, so collection and exfiltration review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2019-25447 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
5.3 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
4Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
5.3CVSS 4.0MediumCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:LPrimary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

5.3Medium
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2019-25447Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
OrientdbOrientDB3.0.17Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-352 · source CWE mapping

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.