LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2019-25290: INIM Electronics Smartliving SmartLAN/G/SI <=6.x Unauthenticated SSRF via GetImage

Smartliving SmartLAN/G/SI <=6.x contains an unauthenticated server-side request forgery vulnerability in the GetImage functionality through the 'host' parameter. Attackers can exploit the onvif.cgi endpoint by specifying external domains to bypass firewalls and perform network enumeration through arbitrary HTTP requests.

MediumCVSS 6.9Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2019-25290 affects INIM Smartliving SmartLAN/G/SI devices running listed 6.x-era versions. An unauthenticated attacker could make the device request attacker-chosen web resources, potentially helping probe internal networks from the device’s position. Business urgency is highest where these alarm or security-control devices are reachable from untrusted networks.

Executive priority

Prioritize review if these devices are internet-facing or on networks with sensitive systems. The vulnerability is not rated critical, but unauthenticated access plus public exploit references create practical risk. Focus first on exposure reduction and vendor guidance.

Technical view

The issue is a CWE-918 server-side request forgery in the GetImage functionality of the onvif.cgi endpoint, using the host parameter. The CVE record describes unauthenticated network access, low attack complexity, and limited integrity impacts. Public exploit references exist, but the provided sources do not establish active exploitation.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely for Smartliving SmartLAN/G/SI systems accessible from the internet, guest networks, or other untrusted segments. Internal-only deployments still matter because SSRF can let an attacker pivot device-originated HTTP requests toward otherwise protected internal resources.

Exploitation context

The source bundle includes Exploit-DB and Packet Storm entries, indicating public exploit information exists. CISA KEV status is false in the provided data, and no cited source confirms active exploitation. Treat internet-facing devices as higher risk because no authentication is required.

Researcher notes

Evidence supports unauthenticated SSRF via the host parameter in GetImage/onvif.cgi for SmartLAN/G/SI <=6.x and listed model variants. The bundle does not include a vendor advisory, fixed version, or confirmed exploitation campaign. Avoid assuming patch availability without checking INIM directly.

Mitigation direction

  • Identify all INIM Smartliving SmartLAN/G/SI devices and firmware versions.
  • Restrict device access to trusted management networks only.
  • Block internet exposure for onvif.cgi and related device management interfaces.
  • Apply vendor updates or mitigations if INIM provides guidance.
  • Monitor for unexpected outbound HTTP requests from affected devices.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether deployed models match the affected product list.
  • Record firmware or software versions for each device.
  • Check external exposure using approved asset-management or attack-surface tooling.
  • Review firewall logs for suspicious outbound requests from devices.
  • Verify segmentation prevents devices from reaching sensitive internal services.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
7

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-918: Information exposure and cloud metadata lookup

Information exposure and SSRF weaknesses can make discovery, cloud metadata, and credential material review relevant. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Cloud metadata behavior lookup

The CVE wording references SSRF or metadata access, so cloud discovery and credential material review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2019-25290 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
6.9 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
6Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
6.9CVSS 4.0MediumCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:LPrimary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

6.9Medium
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2019-25290Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
INIM Electronics s.r.l.Smartliving SmartLAN/G/SI<=6.0, 505, 515, 1050, 1050/G3, 10100L, 10100L/G3Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-918 · source CWE mapping

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.