LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2019-25251: Teradek VidiU Pro 3.0.3 Server-Side Request Forgery via RTMP Settings

Teradek VidiU Pro 3.0.3 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the management interface that allows attackers to manipulate GET parameters 'url' and 'xml_url'. Attackers can exploit this flaw to bypass firewalls, initiate network enumeration, and potentially trigger external HTTP requests to arbitrary destinations.

MediumCVSS 6.9Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2019-25251 is a server-side request forgery issue in Teradek VidiU Pro management interface. An unauthenticated attacker could manipulate RTMP-related URL parameters to make the device send HTTP requests elsewhere. Business risk is highest where these encoders are reachable from untrusted networks or sit inside sensitive production networks.

Executive priority

Treat as a moderate-priority exposure issue. Prioritize internet-facing or production-network devices because SSRF can turn a trusted appliance into a network pivot. If devices are isolated and admin access is tightly controlled, urgency is lower but remediation tracking is still warranted.

Technical view

The source bundle describes CWE-918 SSRF affecting Teradek VidiU Pro versions 3.0.3r32136, 3.0.2r31225, and 2.4.10. The vulnerable management interface accepts attacker-controlled GET parameters named url and xml_url. Reported impacts include firewall bypass, network enumeration, and external HTTP requests to arbitrary destinations. CVSS v4 score is 6.9.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely for organizations using affected Teradek VidiU Pro devices with the management interface reachable from the internet, guest networks, or broad internal networks. Internet-facing broadcast or streaming equipment should be prioritized for review.

Exploitation context

A public ExploitDB entry and Zero Science Lab disclosure are listed, indicating public technical knowledge exists. The bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or confirmed active exploitation, so active exploitation should not be assumed from these sources alone.

Researcher notes

Evidence comes from the CVE record, CVE List data, ExploitDB reference, and Zero Science Lab advisory. The provided sources name affected versions and vulnerable parameters, but do not provide a vendor patch version in the bundle. Avoid assuming broader Teradek product impact without additional vendor confirmation.

Mitigation direction

  • Identify Teradek VidiU Pro devices and record firmware versions.
  • Check Teradek guidance for fixed firmware or vendor-recommended remediation.
  • Restrict management interface access to trusted administrative networks only.
  • Block internet exposure of affected device management interfaces.
  • Monitor device-initiated HTTP requests to unusual internal or external destinations.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory VidiU Pro devices and confirm versions against affected releases.
  • Verify the management interface is not reachable from untrusted networks.
  • Review firewall rules controlling access to device administration ports.
  • Check logs for unexpected outbound HTTP requests from VidiU Pro devices.
  • Track vendor advisories for updates addressing this CVE.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-918: Information exposure and cloud metadata lookup

Information exposure and SSRF weaknesses can make discovery, cloud metadata, and credential material review relevant. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Cloud metadata behavior lookup

The CVE wording references SSRF or metadata access, so cloud discovery and credential material review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2019-25251 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
6.9 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
4Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
6.9CVSS 4.0MediumCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:LPrimary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

6.9Medium
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2019-25251Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
Teradek, LLCVidiU Pro3.0.3r32136, 3.0.2r31225, 2.4.10Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-918 · source CWE mapping

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.