LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2019-25030: In Versa Director, Versa Analytics and VOS, Passwords are not hashed using an adaptive cryptographic hash f...

In Versa Director, Versa Analytics and VOS, Passwords are not hashed using an adaptive cryptographic hash function or key derivation function prior to storage. Popular hashing algorithms based on the Merkle-Damgardconstruction (such as MD5 and SHA-1) alone are insufficient in thwarting password cracking. Attackers can generate and use precomputed hashes for all possible password character combinations (commonly referred to as "rainbow tables") relatively quickly. The use of adaptive hashing algorithms such asscryptorbcryptor Key-Derivation Functions (i.e.PBKDF2) to hash passwords make generation of such rainbow tables computationally infeasible.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

Versa Director, Versa Analytics, and Versa VOS stored passwords without an adaptive password-hashing or key-derivation function. If an attacker obtained the password database, the passwords could be easier to crack offline. The bundle identifies fixed versions, but does not provide CVSS scoring or evidence of active exploitation.

Executive priority

Treat this as a credential-protection issue, not a standalone perimeter breach. Prioritize upgrade and password hygiene where Versa systems manage sensitive network access or administrative accounts.

Technical view

CVE-2019-25030 is a CWE-522 password-storage weakness. The description says non-adaptive Merkle-Damgard hashes such as MD5 or SHA-1 alone are insufficient against precomputed or accelerated cracking. Adaptive options such as scrypt, bcrypt, or PBKDF2 are cited as appropriate defenses. Fixed versions listed are 16.1R2S11, 20.2.2, 21.1.1, and 21.2.1.

Likely exposure

Exposure is likely limited to organizations running Versa Director, Versa Analytics, or Versa VOS versions older than the listed fixed releases. The main risk depends on whether attackers can obtain stored password hashes through another compromise or backup exposure.

Exploitation context

The provided sources do not show active exploitation, KEV listing, exploit code, or a remote attack path. This issue primarily increases impact after credential-store access by making offline password cracking more feasible.

Researcher notes

Evidence is sparse: no CVSS vector, affected-version range, or detailed vendor advisory is included in the bundle. Focus validation on version mapping, password-storage behavior, and whether legacy hashes remain after upgrade.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory Versa Director, Versa Analytics, and Versa VOS versions in use.
  • Upgrade to the listed fixed versions or later vendor-supported releases.
  • Check Versa guidance for any required password rehash or migration steps.
  • After remediation, rotate privileged and local application passwords.
  • Review backup and database access controls around stored credentials.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm deployed versions match fixed releases or later.
  • Verify password storage uses adaptive hashing or a KDF after upgrade.
  • Check whether old password hashes persist after user login or rotation.
  • Review logs for unusual administrative access or credential-database access.
  • Document affected systems and remediation dates for audit tracking.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-522: Credential and account abuse lookup

Authentication and credential weaknesses can make valid-account abuse and credential telemetry useful review starting points. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Credential and access behavior lookup

The CVE wording references authentication or credential exposure, so valid-account and credential-access review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2019-25030 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/aVersa Director, Versa Analytics, Versa VOSFixed Versions: 16.1R2S11, 20.2.2, 21.1.1, 21.2.1Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-522 · source CWE mapping

Insufficiently Protected Credentials

Insufficiently Protected Credentials represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.