LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2019-20915: An issue was discovered in GNU LibreDWG through 0.9.3.

An issue was discovered in GNU LibreDWG through 0.9.3. Crafted input will lead to a heap-based buffer over-read in bit_write_TF in bits.c.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysisunknown

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

GNU LibreDWG through 0.9.3 can read past heap memory when handling crafted input. Business risk depends on whether LibreDWG processes untrusted DWG-related files in your environment. The sources provide no CVSS score and no confirmed active exploitation.

Executive priority

Treat this as a targeted dependency exposure check, not a broad emergency. Prioritize environments that ingest outside CAD files or operate automated DWG processing services. Lack of severity scoring means validation should precede escalation.

Technical view

CVE-2019-20915 is a heap-based buffer over-read in bit_write_TF in bits.c in GNU LibreDWG through 0.9.3. The trigger is crafted input. Public references include an upstream issue and commit, but the CVE metadata does not provide CWE, CVSS, or downstream product details.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely where GNU LibreDWG through 0.9.3 is installed or embedded in workflows that parse, convert, or write DWG data, especially from external users. The provided affected metadata is nonspecific and does not identify downstream products.

Exploitation context

The CVE says crafted input can trigger the over-read. CISA KEV status is false in the supplied bundle, and no cited source confirms active exploitation. Evidence is insufficient to claim remote code execution or weaponized exploitation.

Researcher notes

The record lacks CVSS, CWE, and precise affected CPEs. Do not infer broader product impact from the placeholder affected metadata. Focus analysis on bit_write_TF in bits.c, versions through 0.9.3, and whether vendor packages backported the referenced change.

Mitigation direction

  • Identify GNU LibreDWG installations and embedded dependencies through version 0.9.3.
  • Review upstream LibreDWG guidance and the referenced commit before applying fixes.
  • Restrict untrusted DWG processing until affected components are updated or isolated.
  • Run file-processing services with least privilege and containment where feasible.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm installed LibreDWG versions and package backport status.
  • Map applications that accept DWG or CAD input from external users.
  • Review the upstream issue and commit for the exact fixed code path.
  • After updating, regression test DWG parsing and conversion workflows.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2019-20915 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
3Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.