LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2019-20461: An issue was discovered on Alecto IVM-100 2019-11-12 devices.

An issue was discovered on Alecto IVM-100 2019-11-12 devices. The device uses a custom UDP protocol to start and control video and audio services. The protocol has been partially reverse engineered. Based upon the reverse engineering, no password or username is ever transferred over this protocol. Thus, one can set up the camera connection feed with only the encoded UID. It is possible to set up sessions with the camera over the Internet by using the encoded UID and the custom UDP protocol, because authentication happens at the client side.

CriticalCVSS 9.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2019-20461 describes an authentication design flaw in Alecto IVM-100 cameras. The reported UDP control protocol can establish video and audio sessions using only an encoded device UID, with authentication handled on the client side. Internet-exposed cameras could therefore expose live services without server-side credential verification.

Executive priority

Prioritize this as critical for any exposed Alecto IVM-100 camera. The business risk is unauthorized access to camera audio/video and possible device control. If devices cannot be verified as isolated or remediated, plan rapid containment or replacement.

Technical view

The device uses a custom UDP protocol for video and audio service control. Public reporting says the protocol does not transfer a username or password, and sessions can be established over the Internet with the encoded UID. The CVSS 3.1 score is 9.8, reflecting network access, no privileges, no user interaction, and high CIA impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely where Alecto IVM-100 cameras are deployed with Internet-reachable remote access or permissive UDP paths. The CVE metadata does not provide normalized CPEs, exact firmware ranges, ports, patch status, or deployment prevalence, so asset inventory is essential.

Exploitation context

The sources describe a remotely reachable authentication weakness but do not state active exploitation. CISA KEV status is false in the supplied bundle. The public reference indicates protocol reverse engineering, but this assessment does not rely on exploit instructions.

Researcher notes

Evidence supports a client-side authentication failure in a custom UDP protocol, but affected version data is sparse. The CVE lists Alecto IVM-100 2019-11-12 devices while structured affected fields are n/a. No patch, fixed version, port details, or confirmed exploitation are provided in the bundle.

Mitigation direction

  • Identify any Alecto IVM-100 cameras in use.
  • Remove direct Internet exposure where operationally possible.
  • Restrict camera UDP traffic to trusted networks or VPN access.
  • Check Alecto guidance for firmware, support, or replacement options.
  • Treat unsupported exposed devices as candidates for retirement.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory camera models and deployment locations.
  • Confirm whether any IVM-100 devices are Internet reachable.
  • Review firewall rules for permissive camera UDP access.
  • Determine whether remote access depends only on encoded UIDs.
  • Check available logs for unexpected remote sessions.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-295: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Credential and access behavior lookup

The CVE wording references authentication or credential exposure, so valid-account and credential-access review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2019-20461 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9.8 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
3Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9.8CVSS 3.1CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H3.95.9Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

9.8Critical
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2019-20461Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-295 · source CWE mapping

Improper Certificate Validation

Improper Certificate Validation represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.