LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2019-20055: LuquidPixels LiquiFire OS 4.8.0 allows SSRF via the call%3Durl substring followed by a URL in square brackets.

LuquidPixels LiquiFire OS 4.8.0 allows SSRF via the call%3Durl substring followed by a URL in square brackets.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2019-20055 describes a server-side request forgery issue in LuquidPixels LiquiFire OS 4.8.0. An exposed service may be induced to fetch a URL supplied in a specific request pattern. Business risk depends on where the system sits and what internal services it can reach.

Executive priority

Prioritize discovery and exposure reduction. The CVE lacks severity scoring and patch details, but SSRF can become serious when exposed systems can reach internal services.

Technical view

The CVE record states LiquiFire OS 4.8.0 allows SSRF through a call%3Durl substring followed by a URL in square brackets. Public metadata provides no CVSS score, CWE, vendor advisory, patch version, or named mitigation. The only linked technical reference is a public blog post about testing SSRF in LiquiFire OS.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely where LiquiFire OS 4.8.0 is internet-facing or reachable by untrusted users. Risk increases if the host has outbound access to internal services, cloud metadata, or administrative networks.

Exploitation context

There is public disclosure, but the provided sources do not show CISA KEV listing, active exploitation, weaponized tooling, or exploitation at scale. Treat exploit status as unconfirmed.

Researcher notes

Evidence is sparse: no CVSS, CWE, CPE, vendor advisory, or official fix is included in the supplied metadata. Preserve uncertainty in reporting and validate affected-version claims against deployed assets before assigning urgency.

Mitigation direction

  • Identify any LiquiFire OS 4.8.0 deployments and their internet exposure.
  • Check LiquidPixels or product support channels for vendor guidance or replacement options.
  • Restrict outbound network access from affected hosts to approved destinations only.
  • Block access from affected hosts to cloud metadata and internal administrative services.
  • Limit access to vulnerable endpoints to trusted users or networks where possible.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory web assets for LiquiFire OS 4.8.0 or related LiquiFire services.
  • Review web logs for requests containing call%3Durl or suspicious bracketed URL patterns.
  • Confirm whether untrusted users can reach affected LiquiFire endpoints.
  • Verify egress controls prevent the service from reaching internal-only destinations.
  • Document whether a vendor fix, workaround, or retirement plan exists.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

description · low confidence lookup

Cloud metadata behavior lookup

The CVE wording references SSRF or metadata access, so cloud discovery and credential material review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2019-20055 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.