LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2019-1975: Cisco HyperFlex Software Cross-Frame Scripting Vulnerability

A vulnerability in the web-based interface of Cisco HyperFlex Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to execute a cross-frame scripting (XFS) attack on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to insufficient HTML iframe protection. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by directing a user to an attacker-controlled web page that contains a malicious HTML iframe. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to conduct clickjacking or other clientside browser attacks.

MediumCVSS 6.5Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

Cisco HyperFlex had weak iframe protection in its web interface. A remote attacker could trick a user into visiting a malicious page that frames the interface, enabling clickjacking or related browser-side attacks. User interaction is required, and the CVSS impact emphasizes confidentiality rather than integrity or availability.

Executive priority

Treat this as a moderate-priority management-plane issue. It is not reported as actively exploited, but it can affect sensitive administrative sessions if users can be tricked into visiting malicious pages.

Technical view

CVE-2019-1975 is a cross-frame scripting issue in Cisco HyperFlex Software caused by insufficient HTML iframe protection. It is remotely reachable without authentication but requires user interaction. The CVSS v3.0 vector is AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N, mapped to CWE-693.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely where Cisco HyperFlex HX-Series web management interfaces are accessible to users who could be lured to attacker-controlled pages. The source bundle does not specify exact affected versions, deployment conditions, or internet exposure requirements.

Exploitation context

The described attack requires directing a user to a malicious webpage containing an iframe. The CVE is not listed as CISA KEV in the provided bundle, and no cited source reports active exploitation.

Researcher notes

The public data supports XFS/clickjacking risk and high confidentiality impact, but affected versions are unspecified in the bundle. Avoid assuming patch details beyond Cisco’s advisory. Validation should focus on HyperFlex web interface exposure, user interaction paths, and official Cisco version guidance.

Mitigation direction

  • Review Cisco’s advisory for affected releases, fixed software, and official workarounds.
  • Limit access to HyperFlex management interfaces to trusted administrative networks.
  • Use browser and gateway controls that reduce clickjacking and malicious-page exposure.
  • Prioritize remediation for environments where admins browse from systems with HyperFlex management access.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Cisco HyperFlex HX-Series deployments and associated management interfaces.
  • Check installed HyperFlex Software versions against Cisco’s advisory.
  • Confirm whether management interfaces are reachable from user workstations or untrusted networks.
  • Review security controls for iframe, clickjacking, and malicious site protections.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-693: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2019-1975 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
6.5 (3.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
6.5CVSS 3.0MediumCVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N2.83.6Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.0 score

6.5Medium
CVSS 3.0 vector shape for CVE-2019-1975Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
CiscoCisco HyperFlex HX-SeriesunspecifiedListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-693 · source CWE mapping

Protection Mechanism Failure

Protection Mechanism Failure represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.