LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2019-19685: RoxyFileman, as shipped with nopCommerce v4.2.0, is vulnerable to CSRF because GET requests can be used for...

RoxyFileman, as shipped with nopCommerce v4.2.0, is vulnerable to CSRF because GET requests can be used for renames and deletions.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2019-19685 is a CSRF weakness in RoxyFileman as shipped with nopCommerce v4.2.0. If exposed to an authenticated user, file renames or deletions could be triggered through GET requests. The sources do not provide CVSS, a vendor fix, or evidence of active exploitation.

Executive priority

Treat this as a targeted integrity risk for affected nopCommerce administration environments. Prioritize confirmation if the organization runs nopCommerce v4.2.0, because successful abuse could disrupt or alter site-managed files.

Technical view

The CVE describes missing CSRF protection for state-changing RoxyFileman operations in nopCommerce v4.2.0, specifically rename and delete actions reachable through GET requests. This creates integrity and availability risk for managed files when a logged-in privileged user is induced to make unintended requests.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely in nopCommerce v4.2.0 deployments that include and enable the bundled RoxyFileman component, especially where administrative file-management functionality is reachable by authenticated users.

Exploitation context

The CVE is not listed as KEV in the supplied bundle. A public GitHub reference exists, but the provided evidence does not establish real-world exploitation, exploit maturity, or affected versions beyond nopCommerce v4.2.0 as described.

Researcher notes

The record is sparse: no CVSS, CWE, CPE, patch statement, or detailed affected-version range is provided. Analysis should stay bounded to RoxyFileman bundled with nopCommerce v4.2.0 and the stated CSRF behavior on GET-based rename/delete actions.

Mitigation direction

  • Check nopCommerce and RoxyFileman vendor guidance for fixed versions or recommended changes.
  • Restrict access to administrative file-management paths to trusted users and networks.
  • Disable RoxyFileman if file-management functionality is not required.
  • Review whether state-changing file operations enforce CSRF protections.
  • Ensure backups exist for files managed through the affected interface.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory nopCommerce deployments and identify any running version 4.2.0.
  • Confirm whether bundled RoxyFileman is present, enabled, and reachable.
  • Review administrative file-management routes for rename and delete behavior.
  • Check logs for unexpected file renames or deletions around privileged sessions.
  • Document compensating controls if no vendor fix is available.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2019-19685 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.