LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2019-19683: RoxyFileman, as shipped with nopCommerce v4.2.0, is vulnerable to ../ path traversal via d or f to Admin/Ro...

RoxyFileman, as shipped with nopCommerce v4.2.0, is vulnerable to ../ path traversal via d or f to Admin/RoxyFileman/ProcessRequest because of Libraries/Nop.Services/Media/RoxyFileman/FileRoxyFilemanService.cs.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysisunknown

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2019-19683 describes a path traversal issue in RoxyFileman as bundled with nopCommerce v4.2.0. Affected systems may allow file-manager requests to reference paths outside the intended directory. The public bundle does not provide a CVSS score, vendor advisory, patch details, or evidence of active exploitation.

Executive priority

Prioritize review for any business-critical nopCommerce v4.2.0 site, especially if administrative routes are reachable beyond trusted networks. Urgency is uncertain because scoring and exploitation evidence are missing.

Technical view

The CVE attributes the flaw to Libraries/Nop.Services/Media/RoxyFileman/FileRoxyFilemanService.cs. The vulnerable route is Admin/RoxyFileman/ProcessRequest, with traversal through the d or f parameters. The cited GitHub reference frames the issue as privilege escalation via path traversal, but the provided data lacks confirmed fixed versions.

Likely exposure

Most likely exposure is nopCommerce v4.2.0 deployments that shipped RoxyFileman and expose the admin RoxyFileman handler. The bundle does not identify other affected versions, CPEs, or downstream packages.

Exploitation context

The CVE is not listed as KEV in the supplied bundle. The sources support path traversal risk, but they do not establish active exploitation, exploit prevalence, authentication requirements, or internet-wide targeting.

Researcher notes

Evidence is limited to the CVE description and one public reference. Avoid broad affected-version claims. Focus validation on the named nopCommerce version, RoxyFileman inclusion, the admin handler, and whether vendor-maintained fixes exist.

Mitigation direction

  • Identify any nopCommerce v4.2.0 deployments using bundled RoxyFileman.
  • Check nopCommerce and RoxyFileman vendor guidance for fixed versions or configuration mitigations.
  • Restrict administrative routes to trusted networks and authenticated administrators.
  • Review file-manager permissions and disable unused RoxyFileman functionality where feasible.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory public and internal nopCommerce instances and record their exact versions.
  • Verify whether Admin/RoxyFileman/ProcessRequest is present and reachable.
  • Review access logs for unusual RoxyFileman requests involving path-like parameter values.
  • Confirm remediation against official vendor documentation before closing the finding.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

description · low confidence lookup

File access behavior lookup

The CVE wording references file access or upload behavior, so file telemetry and web shell review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2019-19683 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.