LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2019-1914: Cisco Small Business 220 Series Smart Switches Command Injection Vulnerability

A vulnerability in the web management interface of Cisco Small Business 220 Series Smart Switches could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to perform a command injection attack. The vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of user-supplied input. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a malicious request to certain parts of the web management interface. To send the malicious request, the attacker needs a valid login session in the web management interface as a privilege level 15 user. Depending on the configuration of the affected switch, the malicious request must be sent via HTTP or HTTPS. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary shell commands with the privileges of the root user.

HighCVSS 7.2Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This flaw lets a logged-in administrator of a Cisco Small Business 220 Series switch abuse the web management interface to run operating-system commands as root. It is serious because a compromised or misused privileged account could lead to full device control, but the sources say the attacker needs an authenticated privilege level 15 session.

Executive priority

Prioritize this for environments using Cisco 220 Series switches, especially where management interfaces are broadly reachable. It is not evidenced as actively exploited in the provided sources, but successful abuse gives root-level device control and could affect network availability and trust.

Technical view

CVE-2019-1914 is an authenticated remote command injection in the Cisco Small Business 220 Series web management interface. Cisco attributes it to insufficient validation of user-supplied input. Exploitation requires a valid privilege level 15 login session and access over HTTP or HTTPS, depending on device configuration. Successful exploitation can execute arbitrary shell commands as root.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely where Cisco Small Business 220 Series Smart Plus Switches are deployed and their web management interface is reachable by administrators or broader networks. Risk increases if privileged credentials are shared, weak, or exposed. The provided sources do not specify affected firmware versions.

Exploitation context

The bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or cited evidence of active exploitation. Practical exploitation requires authenticated, high-privilege access to the web management interface, so this is more likely after credential compromise, insider misuse, or poor management-plane isolation.

Researcher notes

The key constraints are authenticated remote access, privilege level 15, and web management reachability. The source bundle does not include precise affected firmware ranges or a named fixed version. Avoid assuming unauthenticated exploitability or current exploitation without additional evidence.

Mitigation direction

  • Check Cisco's advisory for affected releases and fixed software guidance.
  • Restrict switch web management access to trusted administrative networks only.
  • Review privilege level 15 accounts and remove unnecessary access.
  • Disable unused HTTP or HTTPS management paths where operationally feasible.
  • Rotate exposed or shared administrator credentials.
  • Monitor vendor guidance if affected firmware details are unclear.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Cisco Small Business 220 Series Smart Plus Switches.
  • Identify firmware versions and compare them with Cisco advisory guidance.
  • Confirm whether web management is reachable over HTTP or HTTPS.
  • Review privilege level 15 account assignments and recent logins.
  • Check device logs for unusual administrative web management activity.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-20: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2019-1914 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7.2 (3.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
7.2CVSS 3.0HighCVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H1.25.9Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.0 score

7.2High
CVSS 3.0 vector shape for CVE-2019-1914Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
CiscoCisco Small Business 220 Series Smart Plus SwitchesunspecifiedListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-20 · source CWE mapping

Improper Input Validation

Improper Input Validation represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.