LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2019-1798: Clam AntiVirus PE File Out-of-Bounds Read Vulnerability

A vulnerability in the Portable Executable (PE) file scanning functionality of Clam AntiVirus (ClamAV) Software versions 0.101.1 and prior could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause a denial of service condition on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to a lack of proper input and validation checking mechanisms for PE files sent an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending malformed PE files to the device running an affected version ClamAV Software. An exploit could allow the attacker to cause an out-of-bounds read condition, resulting in a crash that could result in a denial of service condition on an affected device.

HighCVSS 7.5Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

ClamAV 0.101.1 and earlier can crash when scanning a malformed Windows PE file. The main business risk is service disruption where ClamAV protects mail, file uploads, or file-transfer workflows. The sources do not show data theft, code execution, or confirmed active exploitation.

Executive priority

Treat as a high-priority availability issue where ClamAV is in production traffic paths. It does not indicate breach by itself, but scanner crashes can weaken security controls and interrupt business workflows.

Technical view

The flaw is improper input validation in ClamAV PE parsing, classified as CWE-20. A remote unauthenticated attacker can provide a malformed PE file to an affected scanner, causing an out-of-bounds read and crash. CVSS 3.0 is 7.5, driven by high availability impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely on systems running ClamAV 0.101.1 or earlier that automatically scan untrusted Windows executables, including mail gateways, upload pipelines, file stores, and security appliances embedding ClamAV.

Exploitation context

The source bundle supports remote unauthenticated denial of service. CISA KEV is false in the supplied data, and no cited source in the bundle confirms active exploitation or public exploit availability.

Researcher notes

Evidence is strongest for version scope, attack preconditions, and denial-of-service impact. The bundle does not provide detailed patch version mapping beyond affected versions, so remediation should follow ClamAV, Cisco, or distribution advisories.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory all ClamAV deployments and embedded ClamAV components.
  • Prioritize systems scanning internet-supplied files or email attachments.
  • Apply the relevant vendor or distribution update guidance.
  • Use compensating controls to reduce untrusted PE scanning exposure until updated.
  • Monitor scanner crash loops and service availability after remediation.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm deployed ClamAV versions are newer than 0.101.1 or vendor-patched.
  • Identify workflows where untrusted PE files reach ClamAV automatically.
  • Review logs for repeated ClamAV crashes during file scanning.
  • Confirm mail, upload, and file-transfer services remain available after updates.
  • Document any appliance or distro package dependencies on ClamAV.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-20: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2019-1798 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7.5 (3.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
3Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
7.5CVSS 3.0HighCVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H3.93.6Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.0 score

7.5High
CVSS 3.0 vector shape for CVE-2019-1798Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
CiscoClamAVunspecifiedListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-20 · source CWE mapping

Improper Input Validation

Improper Input Validation represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.