LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2019-16020: Cisco IOS XR Software BGP EVPN Denial of Service Vulnerabilities

Multiple vulnerabilities in the implementation of Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) Ethernet VPN (EVPN) functionality in Cisco IOS XR Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause a denial of service (DoS) condition. The vulnerabilities are due to incorrect processing of BGP update messages that contain crafted EVPN attributes. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by sending BGP EVPN update messages with malformed attributes to be processed by an affected system. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause the BGP process to restart unexpectedly, resulting in a DoS condition. The Cisco implementation of BGP accepts incoming BGP traffic only from explicitly defined peers. To exploit these vulnerabilities, the malicious BGP update message would need to come from a configured, valid BGP peer, or would need to be injected by the attacker into the victim's BGP network on an existing, valid TCP connection to a BGP peer.

HighCVSS 8.6Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This flaw can let a malicious or compromised BGP peer crash the BGP process on Cisco IOS XR systems using EVPN. The business impact is network instability or outage in environments that rely on affected routers for routing services.

Executive priority

Prioritize review where Cisco IOS XR routers carry critical EVPN routing. The issue is high severity because successful exploitation can disrupt availability, but urgency depends on whether affected devices have BGP EVPN enabled and who can send updates as valid peers.

Technical view

Cisco IOS XR incorrectly processes BGP update messages containing crafted EVPN attributes. A malformed update can cause the BGP process to restart, producing a denial of service. Cisco notes BGP traffic is accepted only from explicitly configured peers, so practical reachability depends on trusted peer access or injection into an existing valid BGP connection.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely in service provider, data center, or enterprise networks running Cisco IOS XR with BGP EVPN configured. The provided sources do not specify affected versions, so teams must verify platform and release details against Cisco’s advisory.

Exploitation context

The bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or other evidence of active exploitation. Exploitation is remote in network terms, but constrained to a configured valid BGP peer or traffic injected into an existing valid BGP peer connection.

Researcher notes

The key exposure boundary is the BGP trust relationship. Research should focus on IOS XR EVPN deployments, configured peer paths, evidence of BGP process instability, and Cisco advisory details for affected and fixed releases. Do not assume broad internet exposure without peer-specific evidence.

Mitigation direction

  • Identify IOS XR devices running BGP EVPN and compare releases against Cisco advisory.
  • Apply Cisco-recommended fixed software or mitigations if the advisory identifies them.
  • Restrict BGP peering to trusted, monitored neighbors and maintain strict peer definitions.
  • Monitor BGP sessions for malformed-update errors, unexpected resets, or process restarts.
  • Review routing change controls for untrusted or recently added EVPN peers.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory IOS XR platforms and confirm whether BGP EVPN is enabled.
  • List configured BGP peers permitted to exchange EVPN routes.
  • Check logs for BGP process restarts around received update events.
  • Confirm current software status against Cisco advisory guidance.
  • Verify operational alerts cover BGP session resets and process restarts.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-399: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2019-16020 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.6 (3.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.6CVSS 3.0HighCVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H3.94Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.0 score

8.6High
CVSS 3.0 vector shape for CVE-2019-16020Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
CiscoCisco IOS XR SoftwareunspecifiedListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-399 · source CWE mapping

Resource Management Errors

Resource Management Errors represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.