LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2019-16019: Cisco IOS XR Software BGP EVPN Denial of Service Vulnerabilities

Multiple vulnerabilities in the implementation of Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) Ethernet VPN (EVPN) functionality in Cisco IOS XR Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause a denial of service (DoS) condition. The vulnerabilities are due to incorrect processing of BGP update messages that contain crafted EVPN attributes. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by sending BGP EVPN update messages with malformed attributes to be processed by an affected system. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause the BGP process to restart unexpectedly, resulting in a DoS condition. The Cisco implementation of BGP accepts incoming BGP traffic only from explicitly defined peers. To exploit these vulnerabilities, the malicious BGP update message would need to come from a configured, valid BGP peer, or would need to be injected by the attacker into the victim's BGP network on an existing, valid TCP connection to a BGP peer.

HighCVSS 8.6Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This affects Cisco IOS XR routers using BGP EVPN. A malformed EVPN BGP update can restart the BGP process, disrupting routing availability. Exploitation is remote but depends on a configured valid BGP peer or injection into an existing valid BGP connection.

Executive priority

Treat this as high priority for networks relying on Cisco IOS XR BGP EVPN. The main business risk is routing disruption, not data theft. Prioritization should focus on routers whose BGP EVPN peers could affect production availability.

Technical view

Cisco describes incorrect processing of BGP update messages containing crafted EVPN attributes. Successful processing can unexpectedly restart the BGP process, creating a denial-of-service condition. The CVSS 3.0 score is 8.6 with network attack vector and high availability impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely on Cisco IOS XR deployments where BGP EVPN is enabled and the device processes updates from configured peers. Internet exposure alone is not sufficient; Cisco notes BGP traffic is accepted only from explicitly defined peers.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not indicate active exploitation, and KEV status is false. An attacker would need a valid configured BGP peer position or the ability to inject a malicious update into an existing valid BGP TCP connection.

Researcher notes

The evidence supports a peer-constrained remote DoS, not arbitrary unauthenticated Internet exploitation. The provided sources do not include exact vulnerable or fixed release data in the bundle, so validation should be anchored to Cisco’s advisory.

Mitigation direction

  • Review Cisco’s advisory for affected IOS XR releases and vendor-provided fixed software guidance.
  • Prioritize remediation on IOS XR routers running BGP EVPN with external or less-trusted peers.
  • Audit configured BGP peers and remove stale, unauthorized, or unnecessary peer relationships.
  • Monitor for unexpected BGP process restarts and routing instability until remediation is complete.
  • Apply normal change control before updating core or provider-edge routing infrastructure.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Cisco IOS XR devices and identify where BGP EVPN is enabled.
  • Compare running IOS XR versions against Cisco’s advisory and fixed-release guidance.
  • Review BGP neighbor configuration for all EVPN-capable routers.
  • Check operational logs for unexpected BGP restarts or EVPN-related update errors.
  • Confirm monitoring alerts on BGP process restarts and route convergence impact.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-399: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2019-16019 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.6 (3.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.6CVSS 3.0HighCVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H3.94Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.0 score

8.6High
CVSS 3.0 vector shape for CVE-2019-16019Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
CiscoCisco IOS XR Softwaren/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-399 · source CWE mapping

Resource Management Errors

Resource Management Errors represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.