LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2019-16002: Cisco SD-WAN Solution vManage Cross-Site Request Forgery Vulnerability

A vulnerability in the vManage web-based UI (web UI) of the Cisco SD-WAN Solution could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack on an affected system. The vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections for the web UI on an affected instance of vManage. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user to follow a malicious link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions with the privilege level of the affected user.

MediumCVSS 6.5Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

Cisco vManage’s web interface lacked sufficient CSRF protection. If an administrator or other logged-in user could be tricked into opening a malicious link, an attacker could cause actions to run as that user. The business risk is unauthorized configuration or administrative changes, not direct data theft or service outage per the CVSS vector.

Executive priority

Prioritize this for SD-WAN environments where vManage administrators routinely access the UI from general browsing workstations. It is not marked as actively exploited, but compromise of management-plane integrity can create meaningful operational risk.

Technical view

CVE-2019-16002 is a CWE-352 CSRF issue in Cisco SD-WAN Solution vManage web UI. It is remotely reachable, requires no attacker authentication, and requires user interaction. Successful exploitation allows arbitrary actions at the affected user’s privilege level. CVSS 3.0 is 6.5 with high integrity impact and no stated confidentiality or availability impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to organizations running Cisco vManage Software where the web UI is reachable by users who can be targeted. The source bundle does not specify affected versions, deployment modes, or fixed releases, so asset owners must confirm applicability against Cisco’s advisory.

Exploitation context

The provided sources describe a malicious-link CSRF scenario requiring a logged-in user’s interaction. The bundle marks KEV as false and provides no evidence of active exploitation. Treat this as credible but interaction-dependent risk, especially for high-privilege vManage users.

Researcher notes

Key gaps are affected version detail and fixed-release detail in the supplied bundle. Validation should focus on product presence, UI exposure, user privilege, and vendor advisory mapping. Avoid claiming exploit activity unless new KEV or vendor evidence appears.

Mitigation direction

  • Review Cisco’s advisory for affected and fixed vManage releases.
  • Upgrade or apply vendor guidance once applicability is confirmed.
  • Restrict vManage web UI access to trusted administrative paths.
  • Reduce unnecessary high-privilege vManage user sessions.
  • Train administrators to avoid unsolicited links while authenticated.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Cisco vManage Software instances and UI exposure.
  • Compare installed versions with Cisco’s advisory guidance.
  • Identify high-privilege users who access vManage web UI.
  • Review change logs for unexpected vManage configuration actions.
  • Confirm compensating access controls around the vManage UI.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-352: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2019-16002 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
6.5 (3.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
6.5CVSS 3.0MediumCVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N2.83.6Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.0 score

6.5Medium
CVSS 3.0 vector shape for CVE-2019-16002Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
CiscoCisco vManage SoftwareunspecifiedListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-352 · source CWE mapping

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.