LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2019-15265: Cisco Aironet Access Points Bridge Protocol Data Unit Port Disable Denial of Service Vulnerability

A vulnerability in the bridge protocol data unit (BPDU) forwarding functionality of Cisco Aironet Access Points (APs) could allow an unauthenticated, adjacent attacker to cause an AP port to go into an error disabled state. The vulnerability occurs because BPDUs received from specific wireless clients are forwarded incorrectly. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability on the wireless network by sending a steady stream of crafted BPDU frames. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause a limited denial of service (DoS) attack because an AP port could go offline.

HighCVSS 7.4Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This flaw can let someone within wireless range disrupt a Cisco Aironet access point link. The issue can force an AP port into an error-disabled state, taking that port offline and causing limited wireless service loss. It is a local-adjacent denial-of-service risk, not a data theft or remote takeover issue.

Executive priority

Treat this as a high-priority availability issue where Cisco Aironet access points support important business locations. It is not presented as data compromise, but a nearby attacker could disrupt wireless service. Patch planning should focus on exposed or operationally critical sites first.

Technical view

Cisco describes improper BPDU forwarding from specific wireless clients in Cisco Aironet AP Software. An unauthenticated adjacent attacker can cause a high-impact availability condition by triggering error-disable behavior on an AP port. The CVSS vector is adjacent network, low complexity, no privileges, no user interaction, changed scope, and high availability impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to environments using Cisco Aironet Access Points running affected Aironet AP Software. The attacker must be adjacent to the wireless network, so internet-only exposure is not indicated by the sources. Exact affected versions are not specified in the provided bundle.

Exploitation context

The public bundle describes a wireless-adjacent denial-of-service condition. CISA KEV status is false, and no cited source in the bundle states active exploitation in the wild. The practical impact is localized service interruption if an AP port goes offline.

Researcher notes

Evidence is strongest for vulnerability mechanics and CVSS impact, but incomplete for affected version ranges and fixes in the supplied bundle. Research should stay anchored to Cisco’s advisory, product software mapping, and operational logs showing AP port error-disable behavior.

Mitigation direction

  • Check Cisco’s advisory for affected releases and fixed software for deployed AP models.
  • Upgrade affected Aironet AP Software when Cisco provides a fixed release for your platform.
  • Prioritize sites where wireless uptime is business-critical or physically exposed to untrusted clients.
  • Monitor AP and switching events for unexpected error-disabled port conditions.
  • Avoid undocumented workarounds; follow Cisco guidance for model-specific remediation.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Cisco Aironet AP models and software versions across wireless sites.
  • Compare deployed versions against Cisco’s advisory and product support guidance.
  • Review AP and switch logs for port error-disabled events tied to wireless traffic.
  • Confirm whether affected APs serve critical offices, guest networks, warehouses, or operations areas.
  • Document any unsupported or unpatched APs for replacement or compensating controls.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-20: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2019-15265 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7.4 (3.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
7.4CVSS 3.0HighCVSS:3.0/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H2.84Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.0 score

7.4High
CVSS 3.0 vector shape for CVE-2019-15265Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
CiscoCisco Aironet Access Point SoftwareunspecifiedListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-20 · source CWE mapping

Improper Input Validation

Improper Input Validation represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.