LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2019-14841: A flaw was found in the RHDM, where an authenticated attacker can change their assigned role in the respons...

A flaw was found in the RHDM, where an authenticated attacker can change their assigned role in the response header. This flaw allows an attacker to gain admin privileges in the Business Central Console.

HighCVSS 8.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This flaw lets a logged-in user elevate their access to administrator in the Business Central Console for RHDM 7 and RHPAM 7. That can expose decision-management workflows, rules, and administrative controls to unauthorized changes. The issue is high severity because it can affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability after ordinary authentication.

Executive priority

Treat this as a high-priority remediation item for any RHDM/RHPAM Business Central deployment, especially if exposed beyond a tightly controlled admin network. The business concern is unauthorized administrative control over process automation or decision-management assets.

Technical view

CVE-2019-14841 is a CWE-281 privilege-assignment flaw in Business Central as shipped with Red Hat Decision Manager 7 and Red Hat Process Automation Manager 7. The CVSS 3.1 score is 8.8, with network access, low privileges, no user interaction, and high impact across CIA.

Likely exposure

Exposure is likely limited to organizations running Business Central from RHDM 7 or RHPAM 7. Risk is higher where the console is reachable from broad internal networks or the internet and where many non-admin authenticated users exist.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or other evidence of active exploitation. The vulnerability requires an authenticated attacker, but no user interaction. Public details are sparse, so avoid assuming exploit availability beyond the role-escalation behavior described by Red Hat/CVE.

Researcher notes

Evidence identifies privilege escalation through role handling in a response header, but the bundle does not include fixed package names, exploit status, or detailed attack mechanics. Focus research on affected Business Central deployments, authorization boundaries, logs, and vendor advisories.

Mitigation direction

  • Check Red Hat guidance for affected builds, errata, and fixed versions.
  • Prioritize updates for internet-reachable or broadly accessible Business Central consoles.
  • Restrict Business Central Console access to trusted networks and approved users.
  • Review and tighten role assignment policies for non-admin users.
  • Monitor for unexpected administrative role changes or privileged console activity.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory RHDM 7 and RHPAM 7 deployments using Business Central.
  • Confirm deployed Business Central versions against Red Hat CVE guidance.
  • Identify whether the console is externally reachable or widely accessible internally.
  • Review logs for non-admin accounts gaining admin-level access.
  • Validate that administrative access requires intended server-side authorization controls.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-281: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2019-14841 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.8 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
3Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.8CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H2.85.9Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

8.8High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2019-14841Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/aBusiness-centralBusiness-central as shipped in RHDM 7 and RHPAM 7Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-281 · source CWE mapping

Improper Preservation of Permissions

Improper Preservation of Permissions represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.