LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2019-14277: Axway SecureTransport 5.x through 5.3 (or 5.x through 5.5 with certain API configuration) is vulnerable to...

Axway SecureTransport 5.x through 5.3 (or 5.x through 5.5 with certain API configuration) is vulnerable to unauthenticated blind XML injection (and XXE) in the resetPassword functionality via the REST API. This vulnerability can lead to local file disclosure, DoS, or URI invocation attacks (i.e., SSRF with resultant remote code execution). NOTE: The vendor disputes this issues as not being a vulnerability because “All attacks that use external entities are blocked (no external DTD or file inclusions, no SSRF). The impact on confidentiality, integrity and availability is not proved on any version.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Discuss exposureBack to CVEs
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysisunknown

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This CVE concerns Axway SecureTransport password-reset API handling. If the researcher report is accurate, an unauthenticated attacker could abuse XML parsing to disclose files, cause denial of service, or trigger server-side requests. Axway disputes the claimed impact, so urgency depends on confirming version, configuration, and exposure.

Executive priority

Treat this as a validation priority for exposed file-transfer systems, not a confirmed emergency. The business risk could be serious if exploitable, but the provided evidence is disputed and lacks confirmed exploitation or CVSS scoring.

Technical view

The CVE describes unauthenticated blind XML injection and XXE in SecureTransport 5.x through 5.3, or through 5.5 with certain REST API configuration. Claimed impacts include local file disclosure, DoS, URI invocation, SSRF, and resultant RCE. Axway states external entities are blocked and impact is not proved.

Likely exposure

Potential exposure is limited to Axway SecureTransport deployments matching the stated 5.x version and REST API resetPassword conditions. Internet-facing or partner-facing managed file transfer portals should be prioritized for inventory. The source bundle does not prove all listed versions are exploitable.

Exploitation context

CISA KEV is false in the provided bundle. Public Exploit-DB, gist, and blog references indicate public research or proof material exists, but the bundle does not confirm active exploitation. The vendor disputes that the issue is a vulnerability.

Researcher notes

Avoid assuming exploitability from the CVE text alone. Correlate version, REST API configuration, XML parser behavior, and Axway’s disputed security notice. Public PoC references should guide defensive validation only, without reproducing offensive steps in production.

Mitigation direction

  • Confirm deployed SecureTransport versions and REST API password-reset exposure.
  • Review Axway security notices and support guidance for official remediation.
  • Restrict unauthenticated access to sensitive REST API surfaces where operationally possible.
  • Monitor SecureTransport logs for abnormal resetPassword API activity.
  • Prioritize vendor-supported upgrades or configuration changes if Axway recommends them.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory SecureTransport 5.x deployments and externally reachable portals.
  • Check whether REST API resetPassword functionality is enabled or exposed.
  • Compare configuration against Axway security notice guidance.
  • Review perimeter logs for suspicious unauthenticated password-reset API requests.
  • Document uncertainty where vendor guidance and public research conflict.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
6

Public sources used

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Cloud metadata behavior lookup

The CVE wording references SSRF or metadata access, so cloud discovery and credential material review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2019-14277 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
6Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.