LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2019-1405: An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Universal Plug and Play (UPnP) service impr...

An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Universal Plug and Play (UPnP) service improperly allows COM object creation, aka 'Windows UPnP Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'.

HighCVSS 7.8Known exploitedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

A logged-in attacker with limited Windows privileges could abuse the UPnP service to gain substantially greater control without user interaction. Because CISA lists this vulnerability as known exploited, unremediated affected Windows endpoints and servers should be treated as credible post-compromise escalation targets.

Executive priority

Treat as a high-priority remediation and threat-hunting item because exploitation is documented through CISA KEV. Focus first on critical servers, privileged workstations, unsupported systems, and hosts with suspicious activity. Local access is required, but successful exploitation could materially expand an existing intrusion.

Technical view

CVE-2019-1405 is a Windows UPnP service elevation-of-privilege flaw involving improper COM object creation. It requires local access and low privileges, has low attack complexity, and needs no user interaction. Its CVSS 3.1 score is 7.8, with potentially high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure applies to the listed Windows and Windows Server releases, including Windows 7, 8.1, multiple Windows 10 releases, and Server 2008 through 2019 variants. Risk is greatest where affected systems remain unremediated and an attacker already has local low-privilege access. The bundle provides no definitive remote attack path.

Exploitation context

CISA KEV status supports known exploitation in the wild. The supplied evidence does not identify exploitation dates, campaigns, threat actors, prevalence, or the specific attack chain. This is a local privilege-escalation vulnerability, so exploitation generally follows initial system access.

Researcher notes

The evidence establishes improper COM object creation in the Windows UPnP service, local low-privilege prerequisites, no user interaction, and high potential impact. It does not provide patch identifiers, affected build boundaries, exploit mechanics, telemetry signatures, or campaign details. Consult Microsoft’s advisory for release-specific remediation and verification information.

Mitigation direction

  • Review Microsoft’s CVE-2019-1405 advisory for the applicable remediation for each Windows release.
  • Prioritize affected systems that are internet-facing, privileged, business-critical, or already showing compromise indicators.
  • Apply Microsoft-supported remediation through the organisation’s normal tested patch-management process.
  • Restrict local access and unnecessary account privileges until affected systems are confirmed remediated.
  • Replace or isolate unsupported Windows releases when Microsoft remediation cannot be obtained.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Windows editions, versions, architectures, and server installation types against the affected list.
  • Use Microsoft’s advisory to determine the required remediation state for each identified system.
  • Confirm remediation deployment and successful installation through endpoint or patch-management records.
  • Identify affected hosts where the UPnP service is present as a prioritization signal, not definitive vulnerability proof.
  • Review endpoint telemetry for unexplained privilege elevation or suspicious COM activity around the UPnP service.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-269: Authorization and privilege behavior lookup

Authorization weaknesses can support privilege escalation and valid-account review, depending on exploit path. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Privilege behavior lookup

The CVE wording references privilege impact, so privilege escalation and authorization behavior review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2019-1405 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7.8 (3.1)
Known Exploited
Yes
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
5Timeline events
2ADP providers
3Source links

CISA KEV status

Status
Known exploited
Source
CISA-ADP
Date added
KEV reference

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: activeAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
7.8CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H1.85.9CISA-ADP

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

7.8High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2019-1405Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. Added to KEVCISA-ADP

    CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities metadata lists this CVE as known exploited.

  4. ADP timelineCISA-ADP

    CVE-2019-1405 added to CISA KEV

  5. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CVECVE Program Container
CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
cvssV3_1other:ssvcother:kev
  • 2022-03-15T00:00:00.000Z: CVE-2019-1405 added to CISA KEV
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
MicrosoftWindows7 for 32-bit Systems Service Pack 1, 7 for x64-based Systems Service Pack 1, 8.1 for 32-bit systems, 8.1 for x64-based systems, RT 8.1, 10 for 32-bit Systems, 10 for x64-based Systems, 10 Version 1607 for 32-bit Systems, 10 Version 1607 for x64-based Systems, 10 Version 1709 for 32-bit Systems, 10 Version 1709 for x64-based Systems, 10 Version 1803 for 32-bit Systems, 10 Version 1803 for x64-based Systems, 10 Version 1803 for ARM64-based Systems, 10 Version 1809 for 32-bit Systems, 10 Version 1809 for x64-based Systems, 10 Version 1809 for ARM64-based Systems, 10 Version 1709 for ARM64-based SystemsListed
MicrosoftWindows Server2008 R2 for x64-based Systems Service Pack 1 (Core installation), 2008 R2 for Itanium-Based Systems Service Pack 1, 2008 R2 for x64-based Systems Service Pack 1, 2008 for 32-bit Systems Service Pack 2 (Core installation), 2012, 2012 (Core installation), 2012 R2, 2012 R2 (Core installation), 2016, 2016 (Core installation), version 1803 (Core Installation), 2019, 2019 (Core installation), 2008 for Itanium-Based Systems Service Pack 2, 2008 for 32-bit Systems Service Pack 2, 2008 for x64-based Systems Service Pack 2, 2008 for x64-based Systems Service Pack 2 (Core installation)Listed
MicrosoftWindows 10 Version 1903 for 32-bit SystemsunspecifiedListed
MicrosoftWindows 10 Version 1903 for x64-based SystemsunspecifiedListed
MicrosoftWindows 10 Version 1903 for ARM64-based SystemsunspecifiedListed
MicrosoftWindows Server, version 1903 (Server Core installation)unspecifiedListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-269 · source CWE mapping

Improper Privilege Management

Improper Privilege Management represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.