LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2019-13624: In ONOS 1.15.0, apps/yang/web/src/main/java/org/onosproject/yang/web/YangWebResource.java mishandles backqu...

In ONOS 1.15.0, apps/yang/web/src/main/java/org/onosproject/yang/web/YangWebResource.java mishandles backquote characters within strings that can be used in a shell command.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysisunknown

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

ONOS 1.15.0 has a reported flaw in its YANG web resource that mishandles backquote characters in strings used by a shell command. That pattern can be dangerous because crafted input may affect command execution. The source bundle does not provide CVSS, exploit requirements, or a confirmed patch status.

Executive priority

Prioritize assessment if ONOS manages production network infrastructure. Business urgency depends on whether ONOS 1.15.0 and the YANG web component are exposed to untrusted or broad internal users.

Technical view

CVE-2019-13624 identifies apps/yang/web/src/main/java/org/onosproject/yang/web/YangWebResource.java in ONOS 1.15.0 as mishandling backquotes inside strings later used in a shell command. The bundle does not document authentication needs, reachable endpoints, impact boundaries, or affected versions beyond ONOS 1.15.0.

Likely exposure

Exposure appears limited to environments running ONOS 1.15.0 with the YANG web functionality present and reachable. The supplied affected-product metadata is incomplete, so confirm exposure from deployed versions and enabled ONOS applications rather than relying on CPE data.

Exploitation context

The bundle does not cite CISA KEV listing or active exploitation. It indicates a shell-command string handling issue, but does not provide exploit prerequisites, proof of exploitation, or real-world abuse evidence.

Researcher notes

Evidence is sparse: no CVSS, CWE, detailed advisory, or affected-version range is included. Treat the shell-command context as potentially serious, but avoid assuming remote unauthenticated exploitation without confirming the endpoint, permissions, and vendor patch details.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory ONOS deployments and identify any running version 1.15.0.
  • Review the referenced ONOS Gerrit change and vendor guidance for the intended fix.
  • Restrict access to ONOS web and YANG management interfaces to trusted administrators.
  • Upgrade or patch ONOS if vendor-maintained guidance confirms a fixed release.
  • Monitor ONOS logs for unusual YANG web requests or command-related errors.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether ONOS 1.15.0 is deployed in production or lab networks.
  • Check whether the YANG app and YangWebResource path exist in the deployed build.
  • Verify whether the referenced Gerrit change is present in source or packaged artifacts.
  • Review access controls around ONOS management, web, and API surfaces.
  • Document any compensating controls if immediate upgrade is unavailable.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2019-13624 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.