LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2019-13404: The MSI installer for Python through 2.7.16 on Windows defaults to the C:\Python27 directory, which makes i...

The MSI installer for Python through 2.7.16 on Windows defaults to the C:\Python27 directory, which makes it easier for local users to deploy Trojan horse code. (This also affects old 3.x releases before 3.5.) NOTE: the vendor's position is that it is the user's responsibility to ensure C:\Python27 access control or choose a different directory, because backwards compatibility requires that C:\Python27 remain the default for 2.7.x

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This issue concerns old Python MSI installers on Windows choosing C:\Python27 by default. If that directory is writable by local non-administrators, they may be able to place malicious code where Python users or applications later load it. The CVE records no CVSS score and no KEV listing.

Executive priority

Treat this as a local privilege and software integrity hygiene issue, not an internet-facing emergency. Prioritize shared Windows systems, build agents, and servers where local users or automation accounts could alter Python directories.

Technical view

CVE-2019-13404 describes a Windows installation-path risk in Python through 2.7.16, also affecting old 3.x releases before 3.5. The concern is local Trojan horse placement enabled by permissive access control on the default C:\Python27 directory. The vendor position cited by CVE places responsibility on users to secure ACLs or choose another directory.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely on Windows hosts with Python installed from affected MSI installers into C:\Python27, especially shared workstations, build systems, or servers where local users have write access to that directory.

Exploitation context

The cited sources support local-user abuse, not remote exploitation. There is no KEV listing and no provided evidence of active exploitation. Practical risk depends on directory permissions and whether privileged or sensitive workflows load Python code from that location.

Researcher notes

The CVE record provides limited technical detail and no CVSS vector. Validation should focus on installer version, path selection, and ACL state. Do not assume exploitability unless a local untrusted user can write to the Python install directory.

Mitigation direction

  • Restrict C:\Python27 write access to administrators and trusted deployment accounts.
  • Choose a secured installation directory for new or rebuilt affected installations.
  • Review Python vendor guidance before changing production interpreter locations.
  • Remove affected Python installs where they are no longer required.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Windows systems with Python installed under C:\Python27.
  • Check filesystem ACLs for non-administrator write access to C:\Python27.
  • Identify applications or scheduled tasks relying on that Python installation.
  • Confirm whether any old 3.x pre-3.5 MSI installs remain.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2019-13404 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.