LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2019-13292: A SQL Injection issue was discovered in webERP 4.15.

A SQL Injection issue was discovered in webERP 4.15. Payments.php accepts payment data in base64 format. After this is decoded, it is deserialized. Then, this deserialized data goes directly into a SQL query, with no sanitizing checks.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

webERP 4.15 has a SQL injection flaw in payment processing. Submitted payment data is decoded and deserialized, then used in a database query without sanitization. For organizations running this version, the main concern is database compromise through a payment-facing code path.

Executive priority

Prioritize remediation if webERP 4.15 is internet-facing or processes sensitive payment or customer data. The public exploit reference increases urgency, but source evidence does not confirm active exploitation or a named patch.

Technical view

The CVE describes Payments.php accepting base64-encoded payment data, decoding and deserializing it, then inserting deserialized values directly into SQL without sanitizing checks. The supplied data is enough to identify an SQL injection condition, but not enough to confirm CVSS, fixed versions, or vendor mitigations.

Likely exposure

Exposure appears limited to deployments of webERP 4.15, especially where Payments.php or payment workflows are reachable by untrusted users. The source bundle does not provide CPEs, deployment conditions, or affected-version ranges beyond 4.15.

Exploitation context

The CVE is not listed as KEV, so active exploitation is not established by the bundle. A public Exploit-DB reference exists, which raises practical risk, but the bundle does not prove exploitation in the wild.

Researcher notes

The record is sparse: no CVSS, CWE, CPEs, vendor advisory, or fixed version are included. Treat affected scope as webERP 4.15 unless vendor guidance expands it.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory webERP deployments and identify any running version 4.15.
  • Check official webERP/vendor guidance for fixed versions or supported remediation.
  • Restrict external access to payment workflows until remediation is confirmed.
  • Review database permissions used by the application for least privilege.
  • Monitor payment-related requests and database errors for suspicious patterns.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether webERP 4.15 is present in production or staging.
  • Review Payments.php handling of decoded and deserialized payment data.
  • Check whether vendor patches or local fixes sanitize query inputs.
  • Review access logs for unusual payment endpoint activity.
  • Verify application database accounts have limited privileges.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

description · low confidence lookup

Database behavior lookup

The CVE wording references database injection or access, so collection and exfiltration review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2019-13292 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.