LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2019-12781: An issue was discovered in Django 1.11 before 1.11.22, 2.1 before 2.1.10, and 2.2 before 2.2.3.

An issue was discovered in Django 1.11 before 1.11.22, 2.1 before 2.1.10, and 2.2 before 2.2.3. An HTTP request is not redirected to HTTPS when the SECURE_PROXY_SSL_HEADER and SECURE_SSL_REDIRECT settings are used, and the proxy connects to Django via HTTPS. In other words, django.http.HttpRequest.scheme has incorrect behavior when a client uses HTTP.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysis

Security readout for executives and security teams

This Django flaw can cause an HTTP request to be treated incorrectly when Django sits behind a reverse proxy and specific HTTPS-related settings are enabled. The business risk is failed HTTPS enforcement, not remote code execution. Affected applications should be updated because the intended redirect to HTTPS may not happen in the documented deployment pattern. Exposure is limited to Django applications on the affected versions using the specified SECURE_PROXY_SSL_HEADER and SECURE_SSL_REDIRECT configuration behind a reverse proxy that connects to Django via HTTPS. Applications not using this deployment pattern are less likely to be affected based on the provided sources. Treat this as a targeted web hardening issue. Prioritize public-facing Django services where HTTPS enforcement is part of compliance, customer trust, or session protection. It is not evidenced as actively exploited in the supplied sources, but the fix is straightforward and should be scheduled promptly. Mitigation focus: Upgrade Django to 1.11.22, 2.1.10, 2.2.3, or later supported releases.; Apply operating-system vendor packages from Debian, Ubuntu, Fedora, or SUSE where applicable.; Inventory Django deployments using SECURE_PROXY_SSL_HEADER and SECURE_SSL_REDIRECT behind reverse proxies..

Prepared

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2019-12781 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
9Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.