LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2019-12663: Cisco IOS XE Software TrustSec Protected Access Credential Provisioning Denial of Service Vulnerability

A vulnerability in the Cisco TrustSec (CTS) Protected Access Credential (PAC) provisioning module of Cisco IOS XE Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause a reload of an affected device, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. The vulnerability is due to improper validation of attributes in RADIUS messages. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a malicious RADIUS message to an affected device while the device is in a specific state.

MediumCVSS 6.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This Cisco IOS XE issue can let a remote unauthenticated attacker crash and reload an affected network device, causing an outage. The attack depends on TrustSec PAC provisioning and a specific device state, so urgency is lower than broadly exploitable router takeover flaws, but affected edge or access devices can still disrupt business operations.

Executive priority

Handle through normal network vulnerability remediation, with faster action for critical routing, switching, or access-control devices. The main business risk is service disruption, not data theft, based on the provided sources.

Technical view

CVE-2019-12663 is improper input validation in the Cisco TrustSec Protected Access Credential provisioning module. Malformed RADIUS message attributes can trigger an IOS XE device reload, producing denial of service. CVSS is 6.8 with network attack vector, high complexity, no privileges, no user interaction, changed scope, and high availability impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely in environments running Cisco IOS XE with Cisco TrustSec CTS PAC provisioning and RADIUS integration. The source bundle does not identify specific affected releases, so product owners must map Cisco IOS XE inventory against Cisco's advisory.

Exploitation context

The CVE record describes remote unauthenticated exploitation, but only while the device is in a specific state. The bundle marks CISA KEV as false and provides no cited evidence of active exploitation or public exploit use.

Researcher notes

The key uncertainty is affected version scope; the bundle lists Cisco IOS XE Software but does not enumerate releases. Do not assume exploit activity. Validation should focus on TrustSec PAC provisioning state, RADIUS exposure, IOS XE release mapping, and reload telemetry.

Mitigation direction

  • Review Cisco's advisory for affected releases, fixed releases, and official upgrade guidance.
  • Prioritize remediation for IOS XE devices supporting critical network paths.
  • Restrict RADIUS traffic to trusted authentication infrastructure using existing network controls.
  • If CTS PAC provisioning is unused, evaluate disabling it with Cisco guidance.
  • Monitor affected devices for unexpected reloads until remediation is complete.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Cisco IOS XE devices and identify TrustSec CTS PAC provisioning usage.
  • Compare IOS XE versions and configurations against Cisco's advisory.
  • Confirm RADIUS communication is limited to expected trusted servers.
  • Review availability logs for unexplained reloads near RADIUS or TrustSec activity.
  • Track remediation status for each affected network device owner.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-20: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Credential and access behavior lookup

The CVE wording references authentication or credential exposure, so valid-account and credential-access review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2019-12663 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
6.8 (3.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
6.8CVSS 3.0MediumCVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H2.24Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.0 score

6.8Medium
CVSS 3.0 vector shape for CVE-2019-12663Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
CiscoCisco IOS XE SoftwareunspecifiedListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-20 · source CWE mapping

Improper Input Validation

Improper Input Validation represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.