LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2019-12621: Cisco HyperFlex Static SSL Key Vulnerability

A vulnerability in Cisco HyperFlex Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to perform a man-in-the-middle attack. The vulnerability is due to insufficient key management. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by obtaining a specific encryption key for the cluster. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform a man-in-the-middle attack against other nodes in the cluster.

MediumCVSS 6.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

Cisco HyperFlex Software used insufficient key management, creating a risk that someone who obtained a specific cluster encryption key could intercept traffic between cluster nodes. The sources describe confidentiality and integrity risk, not service outage. Public evidence provided here does not show active exploitation.

Executive priority

Treat as a moderate-priority infrastructure risk. It can affect data confidentiality and integrity inside HyperFlex clusters, but exploitation requires a specific cluster key and no active exploitation is evidenced in the provided sources.

Technical view

CVE-2019-12621 affects Cisco HyperFlex HX-Series via CWE-320 key management weakness. The CVSS 3.0 score is 6.8 with network attack vector, high attack complexity, no privileges, user interaction required, high confidentiality and integrity impact, and no availability impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to organizations running Cisco HyperFlex HX-Series clusters with affected Cisco HyperFlex Software. The provided sources do not specify exact vulnerable versions or deployment conditions beyond Cisco HyperFlex Software.

Exploitation context

The attacker would need to obtain a specific encryption key for the cluster, making exploitation non-trivial. The provided data says KEV is false and includes no cited evidence of exploitation in the wild.

Researcher notes

The strongest evidence is the CVE record and Cisco advisory reference. Key gaps are exact affected versions, fixed releases, and any practical detection guidance. Avoid claims about exploit maturity without additional cited sources.

Mitigation direction

  • Review Cisco's advisory for affected releases and official remediation guidance.
  • Do not assume a fix; verify Cisco-published fixed software or workarounds.
  • Track all HyperFlex clusters until their remediation status is documented.
  • Escalate vendor support if exact affected versions are unclear.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Cisco HyperFlex HX-Series deployments and software versions.
  • Compare each deployment against Cisco's advisory and support guidance.
  • Confirm whether cluster communication paths are reachable from untrusted networks.
  • Document compensating controls and remediation owner for each cluster.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-320: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2019-12621 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
6.8 (3.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
6.8CVSS 3.0MediumCVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N1.65.2Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.0 score

6.8Medium
CVSS 3.0 vector shape for CVE-2019-12621Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
CiscoCisco HyperFlex HX-SeriesunspecifiedListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-320 · source CWE mapping

Key Management Errors

Key Management Errors represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.