LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2019-11246: kubectl cp allows symlink directory traversal

The kubectl cp command allows copying files between containers and the user machine. To copy files from a container, Kubernetes runs tar inside the container to create a tar archive, copies it over the network, and kubectl unpacks it on the user’s machine. If the tar binary in the container is malicious, it could run any code and output unexpected, malicious results. An attacker could use this to write files to any path on the user’s machine when kubectl cp is called, limited only by the system permissions of the local user. Kubernetes affected versions include versions prior to 1.12.9, versions prior to 1.13.6, versions prior to 1.14.2, and versions 1.1, 1.2, 1.4, 1.4, 1.5, 1.6, 1.7, 1.8, 1.9, 1.10, 1.11.

MediumCVSS 6.4Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This flaw affects kubectl cp, a Kubernetes file-copy feature. If a user copies files from a malicious or compromised container, the container’s tar behavior can cause files to be written outside the intended destination on the user’s machine, within that user’s permissions.

Executive priority

Treat this as a moderate operational risk. It is not documented here as actively exploited, but it can compromise administrator or automation hosts if staff copy files from hostile containers. Prioritize patched kubectl clients in privileged environments.

Technical view

kubectl cp extracts a tar archive produced inside the container. A malicious tar binary or crafted archive behavior can abuse symlink directory traversal during extraction, allowing arbitrary local file writes when the user initiates kubectl cp from the container. Affected Kubernetes versions are older than 1.12.9, 1.13.6, and 1.14.2, plus 1.1 through 1.11.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely on administrator workstations, jump hosts, and CI systems using affected kubectl versions and copying files from untrusted or compromised containers. Impact is local to the machine running kubectl and limited by that user’s filesystem permissions.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not show KEV listing or active exploitation evidence. Exploitation requires attacker influence over the container or tar behavior and user interaction: someone must run kubectl cp from that container.

Researcher notes

The key boundary is the operator machine, not the Kubernetes API server itself. Validate client-side tooling and workflows. The CVSS vector indicates high privileges and user interaction, so exposure depends heavily on who can influence containers and who runs kubectl cp.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade kubectl/Kubernetes clients to 1.12.9, 1.13.6, 1.14.2, or later supported releases.
  • Avoid kubectl cp from untrusted, suspicious, or compromised containers until clients are fixed.
  • Inventory CI runners, admin laptops, and bastion hosts for affected kubectl versions.
  • Restrict cluster users who can access or copy from sensitive workloads.
  • Review Kubernetes and vendor advisories for environment-specific guidance.

Validation and detection

  • Check kubectl versions used by administrators, automation, and CI systems.
  • Compare discovered versions against the affected version ranges in the CVE record.
  • Review scripts and runbooks that copy files from containers using kubectl cp.
  • Identify whether file copies occur from third-party, user-controlled, or incident-response containers.
  • Confirm patched clients are deployed before resuming risky copy workflows.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-61: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

File access behavior lookup

The CVE wording references file access or upload behavior, so file telemetry and web shell review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Container behavior lookup

The affected technology mentions containers, so container-specific ATT&CK technique review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2019-11246 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
6.4 (3.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
4Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
6.4CVSS 3.0MediumCVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H0.55.9Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.0 score

6.4Medium
CVSS 3.0 vector shape for CVE-2019-11246Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
KubernetesKubernetesprior to 1.12.9, prior to 1.13.6, prior to 1.14.2, 1.1, 1.2, 1.4, 1.5, 1.6, 1.7, 1.8, 1.9, 1.10, 1.11Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-61 · source CWE mapping

UNIX Symbolic Link (Symlink) Following

UNIX Symbolic Link (Symlink) Following represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.