LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2019-10198: An authentication bypass vulnerability was discovered in foreman-tasks before 0.15.7.

An authentication bypass vulnerability was discovered in foreman-tasks before 0.15.7. Previously, commit tasks were searched through find_resource, which performed authorization checks. After the change to Foreman, an unauthenticated user can view the details of a task through the web UI or API, if they can discover or guess the UUID of the task.

MediumCVSS 6.5Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2019-10198 lets someone access Foreman task details without proper authorization if they know or can guess a task UUID. The business risk is unauthorized disclosure of task information through the Foreman web UI or API, not system takeover based on the provided sources.

Executive priority

Treat as a moderate-priority confidentiality issue. Patch during the next security maintenance window, sooner if Foreman is internet-facing or task details may reveal secrets, infrastructure changes, or operational data.

Technical view

foreman-tasks before 0.15.7 used a task lookup path that no longer applied the prior find_resource authorization checks. Sources state task details could be viewed through the web UI or API when a task UUID is discovered or guessed. CVSS 3.0 is 6.5 with high confidentiality impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely in Foreman environments running vulnerable foreman-tasks before 0.15.7, especially where the web UI or API is reachable by untrusted users or networks.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or confirmed active exploitation. Practical abuse depends on discovering or guessing task UUIDs and the task details containing sensitive operational information.

Researcher notes

There is a source nuance: the narrative says unauthenticated access is possible, while the bundled CVSS vector lists PR:L. Validate behavior against the exact Foreman and foreman-tasks package build in use.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade foreman-tasks to 0.15.7 or vendor-provided fixed builds where applicable.
  • Review Red Hat advisory RHSA-2019:3172 for packaged remediation guidance.
  • Restrict Foreman web UI and API access to trusted networks and authenticated users.
  • Limit task detail exposure and review roles until remediation is complete.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Foreman deployments and installed foreman-tasks versions.
  • Confirm whether exposed systems run foreman-tasks before 0.15.7.
  • Verify task detail access enforces authorization in the UI and API.
  • Review access logs for unusual task-detail requests by UUID.
  • Check vendor advisories for affected package names in your distribution.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-592: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Credential and access behavior lookup

The CVE wording references authentication or credential exposure, so valid-account and credential-access review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2019-10198 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
6.5 (3.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
4Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
6.5CVSS 3.0MediumCVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N2.83.6Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.0 score

6.5Medium
CVSS 3.0 vector shape for CVE-2019-10198Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
The Foreman Projectforeman-tasks0.15.7Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-592 · source CWE mapping

DEPRECATED: Authentication Bypass Issues

DEPRECATED: Authentication Bypass Issues represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.