LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2019-0042: Incorrect messages from Juniper Identity Management Service (JIMS) can trigger Denial of Service or firewall bypass conditions for SRX series devices

Juniper Identity Management Service (JIMS) for Windows versions prior to 1.1.4 may send an incorrect message to associated SRX services gateways. This may allow an attacker with physical access to an existing domain connected Windows system to bypass SRX firewall policies, or trigger a Denial of Service (DoS) condition for the network.

MediumCVSS 5.7Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This flaw affects Juniper Identity Management Service on Windows before 1.1.4. Incorrect identity messages sent to SRX gateways could let someone with physical access to a domain-connected Windows system bypass firewall policy or disrupt network availability.

Executive priority

Treat as a targeted infrastructure risk, not a mass internet emergency. Prioritize remediation if SRX firewall policy enforcement depends on JIMS, especially in locations where domain-connected Windows systems may be physically accessible.

Technical view

JIMS may generate incorrect messages consumed by associated SRX service gateways. The CVSS vector indicates physical access, high attack complexity, no privileges or user interaction, changed scope, low integrity impact, and high availability impact. The issue maps to authentication, resource management, and incorrect resource transfer weaknesses.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely where Juniper JIMS for Windows is deployed below version 1.1.4 and integrated with SRX gateways for identity-aware policy decisions. The physical-access requirement limits broad remote exposure but does not remove risk in shared, branch, kiosk, or weakly controlled Windows environments.

Exploitation context

The provided sources do not show CISA KEV listing or confirmed active exploitation. The described scenario requires physical access to an existing domain-connected Windows system, making opportunistic internet exploitation unlikely based on the available evidence.

Researcher notes

Public detail in the provided bundle is limited. Focus validation on JIMS version, SRX integration paths, and identity-message trust boundaries. Do not assume affected SRX firmware versions or exploit maturity beyond the cited description.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade Juniper Identity Management Service for Windows to version 1.1.4 or later.
  • Review Juniper advisory JSA10934 for vendor-specific deployment guidance.
  • Limit physical access to domain-connected Windows systems that interact with JIMS.
  • Monitor SRX and JIMS behavior for unexpected policy decisions or availability disruption.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory JIMS deployments and identify associated SRX gateways.
  • Verify each JIMS installation is version 1.1.4 or later.
  • Confirm domain-connected Windows systems with physical access are controlled and monitored.
  • Review SRX policy logs for unusual identity-driven allow or deny behavior.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-305: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-404: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-669: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2019-0042 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
5.7 (3.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
5.7CVSS 3.0MediumCVSS:3.0/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:H0.54.7Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.0 score

5.7Medium
CVSS 3.0 vector shape for CVE-2019-0042Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
Juniper NetworksJuniper Identity Management ServiceunspecifiedListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-305 · source CWE mapping

Authentication Bypass by Primary Weakness

Authentication Bypass by Primary Weakness represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.

CWE-404 · source CWE mapping

Improper Resource Shutdown or Release

Improper Resource Shutdown or Release represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.

CWE-669 · source CWE mapping

Incorrect Resource Transfer Between Spheres

Incorrect Resource Transfer Between Spheres represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.