LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2019-0035: Junos OS: 'set system ports console insecure' allows root password recovery on OAM volumes

When "set system ports console insecure" is enabled, root login is disallowed for Junos OS as expected. However, the root password can be changed using "set system root-authentication plain-text-password" on systems booted from an OAM (Operations, Administration, and Maintenance) volume, leading to a possible administrative bypass with physical access to the console. OAM volumes (e.g. flash drives) are typically instantiated as /dev/gpt/oam, or /oam for short. Password recovery, changing the root password from a console, should not have been allowed from an insecure console. Affected releases are Juniper Networks Junos OS: 15.1 versions prior to 15.1F6-S12, 15.1R7-S3; 15.1X49 versions prior to 15.1X49-D160; 15.1X53 versions prior to 15.1X53-D236, 15.1X53-D496, 15.1X53-D68; 16.1 versions prior to 16.1R3-S10, 16.1R6-S6, 16.1R7-S3; 16.1X65 versions prior to 16.1X65-D49; 16.2 versions prior to 16.2R2-S8; 17.1 versions prior to 17.1R2-S10, 17.1R3; 17.2 versions prior to 17.2R1-S8, 17.2R3-S1; 17.3 versions prior to 17.3R3-S3; 17.4 versions prior to 17.4R1-S6, 17.4R2-S2; 18.1 versions prior to 18.1R2-S4, 18.1R3-S3; 18.2 versions prior to 18.2R2; 18.2X75 versions prior to 18.2X75-D40; 18.3 versions prior to 18.3R1-S2. This issue does not affect Junos OS releases prior to 15.1.

MediumCVSS 6.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

A person with physical console access to affected Junos OS devices may be able to reset the root password despite a setting intended to block root login. This is mainly a site-access and device-hardening risk, but successful abuse could give full administrative control of network equipment.

Executive priority

Prioritize devices in shared facilities, remote sites, labs, or data centers where console access is harder to control. This is not a typical remote exploit risk, but compromise could mean full administrative control of critical routing or security infrastructure.

Technical view

CVE-2019-0035 affects Junos OS 15.1 through 18.3 branches listed by Juniper. When `set system ports console insecure` is enabled, password recovery should be blocked, but systems booted from an OAM volume may still allow root password changes, creating an administrative bypass with physical console access.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to affected Junos OS releases where insecure console mode is enabled and an attacker can reach the physical console, particularly systems using or booting from OAM volumes such as `/dev/gpt/oam` or `/oam`.

Exploitation context

The provided sources do not report active exploitation, and the CVE is not marked KEV. The required physical access lowers broad internet-scale risk, but the impact is high where branch, data center, or shared facilities expose device consoles.

Researcher notes

The source bundle supports affected versions, prerequisite configuration, OAM-volume condition, physical attack vector, and fixed release thresholds. It does not provide exploit code, proof-of-concept status, or evidence of in-the-wild exploitation.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade affected Junos OS releases to Juniper-listed fixed versions.
  • Review Juniper JSA10924 for product-specific remediation guidance.
  • Disable `set system ports console insecure` unless explicitly required.
  • Restrict and monitor physical console access to Junos devices.
  • Harden access to removable or OAM boot media.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Junos OS versions across Juniper devices.
  • Check configurations for `set system ports console insecure`.
  • Identify devices with OAM volumes such as `/oam`.
  • Confirm physical console access is controlled and logged.
  • Map each device branch to Juniper's fixed release thresholds.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-501: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Credential and access behavior lookup

The CVE wording references authentication or credential exposure, so valid-account and credential-access review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2019-0035 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
6.8 (3.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
6.8CVSS 3.0MediumCVSS:3.0/AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H0.95.9Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.0 score

6.8Medium
CVSS 3.0 vector shape for CVE-2019-0035Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
Juniper NetworksJunos OS15.1, 15.1X49, 15.1X53, 16.1, 16.1X65, 16.2, 17.1, 17.2, 17.3, 17.4, 18.1, 18.2, 18.2X75, 18.3, allListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-501 · source CWE mapping

Trust Boundary Violation

Trust Boundary Violation represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.