LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2018-8930: The AMD EPYC Server, Ryzen, Ryzen Pro, and Ryzen Mobile processor chips have insufficient enforcement of Ha...

The AMD EPYC Server, Ryzen, Ryzen Pro, and Ryzen Mobile processor chips have insufficient enforcement of Hardware Validated Boot, aka MASTERKEY-1, MASTERKEY-2, and MASTERKEY-3.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysisunknown

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This CVE concerns certain AMD EPYC Server, Ryzen, Ryzen Pro, and Ryzen Mobile processors. The reported issue is insufficient enforcement of Hardware Validated Boot, meaning platform trust protections may not behave as intended. The source bundle does not provide a CVSS score, confirmed exploitation, or complete remediation details.

Executive priority

Set priority after asset confirmation. This is not KEV-listed and lacks a CVSS score in the bundle, but it affects hardware trust on AMD platforms. Critical servers using affected AMD processors deserve timely firmware governance review.

Technical view

CVE-2018-8930 maps to the MASTERKEY-1, MASTERKEY-2, and MASTERKEY-3 issues affecting AMD processor platforms. The vulnerability description identifies weak enforcement of Hardware Validated Boot. The bundle includes AMD, HPE, Trail of Bits, amdflaws.com, and whitepaper references, but no structured CWE, CVSS vector, affected-version matrix, or patch status.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most relevant to environments running AMD EPYC Server, Ryzen, Ryzen Pro, or Ryzen Mobile systems. The provided data does not identify exact models, firmware versions, OEM platforms, or operating systems, so teams should inventory AMD hardware and compare it with vendor advisories.

Exploitation context

The CVE is not listed as CISA KEV in the provided bundle. The bundle does not prove active exploitation. Because the issue concerns boot validation and processor platform trust, exploitation assessment should focus on firmware state, OEM guidance, and whether affected AMD-based systems are in sensitive roles.

Researcher notes

Key gaps are exact affected versions, exploit preconditions, and confirmed remediation. The safest interpretation is source-limited: insufficient Hardware Validated Boot enforcement on named AMD processor families, with external references available for deeper vendor and technical context.

Mitigation direction

  • Check AMD and OEM advisories for platform-specific firmware guidance.
  • Prioritize firmware review for AMD EPYC servers in critical environments.
  • Track HPE guidance for any impacted HPE AMD-based systems.
  • Restrict administrative and firmware-update capabilities to trusted operators.
  • Monitor vendor sources for corrected firmware or compensating controls.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory AMD EPYC, Ryzen, Ryzen Pro, and Ryzen Mobile assets.
  • Record BIOS, UEFI, and platform firmware versions for each system.
  • Compare hardware and firmware against AMD and OEM advisories.
  • Confirm whether HPE advisory coverage applies to deployed systems.
  • Document any systems where vendor fix status remains unclear.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
7

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2018-8930 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
6Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.