CVE-2018-8859: Echelon SmartServer 1 all versions, SmartServer 2 all versions prior to release 4.11.007, i.LON 100 all ver...
Echelon SmartServer 1 all versions, SmartServer 2 all versions prior to release 4.11.007, i.LON 100 all versions, and i.LON 600 all versions. An attacker can bypass the required authentication specified in the security configuration file by including extra characters in the directory name when specifying the directory to be accessed. This vulnerability does not affect the i.LON 600 product.
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
This is a critical authentication-bypass issue in Echelon industrial control devices. A remote unauthenticated attacker may access protected directories by adding extra characters to a requested directory name. Successful exploitation could compromise confidentiality, integrity, and availability of affected systems.
Executive priority
Treat this as urgent for any network-reachable affected device. The issue can bypass authentication and has a critical 9.8 CVSS score, but current provided evidence does not establish active exploitation.
Technical view
CVE-2018-8859 is CWE-288 authentication bypass in Echelon SmartServer 1, SmartServer 2 before 4.11.007, and i.LON 100. The source description says crafted directory names can bypass authentication rules in the security configuration file. CVSS v3.1 is 9.8: network, low complexity, no privileges, no user interaction.
Likely exposure
Exposure is most relevant where affected Echelon SmartServer or i.LON 100 devices are reachable over a network, especially from untrusted networks. The bundle contains conflicting i.LON 600 data, but the description says i.LON 600 is not affected.
Exploitation context
The provided sources do not show active exploitation, and the CVE is not marked as CISA KEV. The CVSS vector indicates exploitation is remotely reachable and requires no credentials or user interaction, making any exposed affected device high priority.
Researcher notes
The source bundle is internally inconsistent: affected data lists i.LON 600, while the CVE description says it is not affected. Do not assume i.LON 600 exposure without confirming against the referenced advisory or vendor guidance.
Mitigation direction
Upgrade SmartServer 2 deployments to release 4.11.007 or later.
Check vendor or CISA guidance for SmartServer 1 and i.LON 100 remediation options.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cwe · low confidence lookup
CWE-288: Exact CWE lookup
Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
2ADP providers
2Source links
SSVC decision data
CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: total
CVSS vector scores
1 official score
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
CWE-288 · source CWE mapping
Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel
Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.