LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2018-8097: io/mongo/parser.py in Eve (aka pyeve) before 0.7.5 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via Co...

io/mongo/parser.py in Eve (aka pyeve) before 0.7.5 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via Code Injection in the where parameter.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2018-8097 is a code-injection issue in Eve, also known as pyeve. A remote attacker could use the where parameter to execute arbitrary code in vulnerable versions before 0.7.5. This is potentially serious for any internet-facing API built on affected Eve versions.

Executive priority

Treat this as high priority where affected Eve APIs are internet-facing or process sensitive data. Lack of CVSS does not reduce concern because the described impact is remote arbitrary code execution.

Technical view

The CVE identifies io/mongo/parser.py in Eve before 0.7.5 as vulnerable to code injection through the where parameter. The public record does not provide CVSS, CWE, affected CPEs, or detailed exploit conditions beyond remote attacker capability and arbitrary code execution impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely in applications using Eve/pyeve before 0.7.5, especially APIs where user-controlled where parameters reach the Mongo parser path. The bundle does not identify specific downstream products or deployments.

Exploitation context

The source bundle states remote attackers can execute arbitrary code via the where parameter. It does not cite active exploitation, and the CVE is not marked as CISA KEV, so active exploitation should not be asserted.

Researcher notes

Evidence is limited to the CVE description and linked GitHub issue and commit. The affected product metadata is incomplete in the bundle, so validation should focus on dependency inventory and reachable where parameter handling.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade Eve/pyeve to version 0.7.5 or later.
  • Review the linked project commit and issue for vendor-specific fix context.
  • Restrict external access to affected Eve API endpoints until upgraded.
  • Avoid accepting untrusted where parameters on public API routes.
  • Monitor vendor guidance for any additional remediation notes.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory applications and lockfiles for Eve or pyeve versions before 0.7.5.
  • Confirm deployed services run Eve/pyeve 0.7.5 or later.
  • Identify public endpoints that accept user-controlled where parameters.
  • Review logs for unusual or repeated where parameter use.
  • Verify remediation in staging before redeploying affected APIs.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2018-8097 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
3Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.