CVE-2018-25338: Zechat 1.5 SQL Injection via hashtag parameter
Zechat 1.5 contains a SQL injection vulnerability in the hashtag parameter that allows unauthenticated attackers to extract database information using union-based techniques. Attackers can exploit the hashtag parameter with union-based payloads to retrieve table and column names.
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
Zechat 1.5 has a SQL injection flaw in the hashtag parameter. An unauthenticated internet user could query backend database metadata and potentially sensitive information. The source bundle names public exploit material, but does not show CISA KEV listing or confirmed active exploitation.
Executive priority
Prioritize identification and containment of any Zechat 1.5 deployment. The vulnerability is remotely reachable without authentication and targets database confidentiality. Urgency is high, but confirmed active exploitation is not established by the provided sources.
Technical view
CVE-2018-25338 is CWE-89 SQL injection in Bylancer Zechat 1.5. The hashtag parameter is vulnerable to union-based SQL injection. CVSS 4.0 is 8.8 with network access, low complexity, no privileges, and no user interaction required.
Likely exposure
Exposure is likely limited to organizations running Bylancer Zechat version 1.5, especially if the affected hashtag functionality is internet-accessible. The bundle provides no CPEs, asset prevalence, hosting defaults, or vendor patch details.
Exploitation context
The source bundle cites ExploitDB and VulnCheck references, so public exploit information exists. It does not cite KEV status or another source confirming active exploitation in the wild. Treat reachable Zechat 1.5 instances as high-risk until assessed.
Researcher notes
Do not assume broader Bylancer products are affected. The evidence names Zechat 1.5 and the hashtag parameter only. The bundle does not provide patch status, affected CPEs, or exploit-in-the-wild confirmation beyond public exploit publication.
Mitigation direction
Check Bylancer or Zechat guidance for a fixed release or official workaround.
Upgrade, retire, or isolate Zechat 1.5 if no supported fix is available.
Restrict public access to affected hashtag functionality where business permits.
Use parameterized database queries if maintaining or patching the application code.
Monitor web and database logs for suspicious hashtag requests.
Validation and detection
Inventory internet-facing systems for Bylancer Zechat deployments.
Confirm whether any deployment is version 1.5.
Review hashtag parameter handling for unsafe SQL construction.
Check whether affected routes require authentication or network restrictions.
Review logs for unusual database enumeration patterns.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cwe · medium confidence lookup
CWE-89: Database access and collection lookup
Injection into data stores can inform collection, data access, and exfiltration detection reviews. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
The CVE wording references database injection or access, so collection and exfiltration review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.