LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2018-25310: VideoFlow Digital Video Protection DVP 10 Authenticated Remote Code Execution

VideoFlow Digital Video Protection DVP 2.10 contains an authenticated remote code execution vulnerability that allows authenticated attackers to execute arbitrary system commands by exploiting a cross-site request forgery flaw in the web management interface. Attackers with valid credentials can leverage the CSRF vulnerability to inject and execute system commands through the Tools > System > Shell interface, gaining root-level access to the device.

MediumCVSS 5.3Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This issue affects VideoFlow Digital Video Protection devices and can let a logged-in attacker run system commands through the web management interface. The source bundle says commands may execute with root-level access. It is not listed as CISA KEV, and the provided sources do not prove active exploitation.

Executive priority

Treat as a targeted remediation item for environments using VideoFlow DVP. Prioritize devices with exposed management interfaces or high business impact. The rating is moderate, but root-level command execution makes affected, reachable devices important to contain.

Technical view

CVE-2018-25310 is an authenticated remote command execution issue tied to CWE-352 in VideoFlow Digital Video Protection 2.10, 1.40.0.15, and 2.10.0.5. The described attack path abuses CSRF in the web management interface’s shell functionality to execute arbitrary system commands. CVSS v4.0 score is 5.3.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most relevant where VideoFlow DVP web management is reachable by untrusted networks or where weak, shared, or compromised credentials exist. Internet-exposed administration interfaces increase business risk, even though the vulnerability requires valid credentials according to the sources.

Exploitation context

A public Exploit-DB entry and third-party advisories exist, so technical details are public. The provided sources do not show active exploitation, and KEV status is false. Exploitation requires authenticated access per the CVE description.

Researcher notes

The bundle identifies CWE-352 and authenticated RCE, with public exploit/advisory references. No source in the bundle names a specific patched version or vendor remediation. Avoid assuming active exploitation or broader affected products beyond the listed VideoFlow DVP versions.

Mitigation direction

  • Check VideoFlow or trusted advisory sources for fixed firmware or official guidance.
  • Restrict web management access to trusted administrative networks only.
  • Disable internet exposure of the management interface where possible.
  • Review and tighten administrator account access and password hygiene.
  • Monitor devices for unexpected configuration changes or command execution indicators.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory VideoFlow DVP devices and firmware versions.
  • Confirm whether versions 2.10, 1.40.0.15, or 2.10.0.5 are present.
  • Identify whether web management is reachable from untrusted networks.
  • Review administrative accounts for unnecessary or shared credentials.
  • Check logs for unusual management activity, where logging is available.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-352: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2018-25310 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
5.3 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
5Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
5.3CVSS 4.0MediumCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:LPrimary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

5.3Medium
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2018-25310Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
VideoFlow Ltd.VideoFlow Digital Video Protection2.10, 1.40.0.15, 2.10.0.5Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-352 · source CWE mapping

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.