LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2018-25307: SysGauge Pro 4.6.12 Local Buffer Overflow SEH

SysGauge Pro 4.6.12 contains a local buffer overflow vulnerability in the Register function that allows local attackers to overwrite the structured exception handler by supplying a crafted unlock key. Attackers can inject shellcode through the Unlock Key field during registration to execute arbitrary code with application privileges.

HighCVSS 8.6Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

SysGauge Pro 4.6.12, a Windows system monitoring tool, has a flaw in its license registration screen. If someone pastes a specially crafted "unlock key," the program crashes in a way that lets attacker-supplied code run with the same rights as the user running the app. The attacker must already be on the machine, and a working public exploit exists.

Executive priority

Plan-and-patch priority. Risk is real but local-only and bounded to a niche admin tool, so handle through standard vulnerability management rather than emergency change. Escalate if SysGauge Pro is broadly deployed, runs under privileged service accounts, or sits on shared/RDP hosts where untrusted users can interact with it.

Technical view

A stack-based buffer overflow (CWE-120) in the SysGauge Pro 4.6.12 Register function lets an oversized Unlock Key overwrite the Structured Exception Handler (SEH) record. Triggering an exception then redirects execution to attacker-controlled data. CVSS 4.0 is 8.6 with local attack vector, no privileges, and high impact to confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the application context.

Likely exposure

Limited to endpoints with SysGauge Pro 4.6.12 installed, primarily Windows systems used by IT and storage administrators. Exploitation requires local interaction with the registration dialog, so internet-facing exposure is low, but the public ExploitDB proof of concept lowers the technical bar for any local attacker or malware.

Exploitation context

A working exploit is published on Exploit-DB (entry 44455) and VulnCheck describes the SEH-overwrite technique. CISA KEV does not list this CVE and no cited source confirms in-the-wild abuse. Realistic abuse scenarios are local code execution, application-context persistence, or staging for AV evasion rather than remote compromise.

Researcher notes

SEH overwrite via the Unlock Key field implies likely absence of /SAFESEH or SEHOP on the target binary; system-wide SEHOP and modern ASLR may blunt the public PoC but should be confirmed per host. No CPE entries are published, complicating automated detection, so rely on software inventory and file-version checks. Watch for a vendor-issued fixed build; none is cited in the source bundle as of this analysis.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory all hosts running SysGauge Pro and confirm whether version 4.6.12 is present.
  • Check Sysgauge vendor guidance for a fixed release and upgrade affected installs.
  • Restrict who can launch SysGauge Pro to trusted administrators on managed endpoints.
  • Block or remove the application on workstations where it is not operationally required.
  • Treat any unsolicited license keys or registration prompts as suspicious and discard them.

Validation and detection

  • Enumerate installed software inventories for SysGauge Pro 4.6.12 across Windows endpoints.
  • Confirm running version via the application's About dialog or executable metadata.
  • Verify whether application binaries enable SafeSEH, SEHOP, ASLR, and DEP exploit mitigations.
  • Review EDR telemetry for SysGauge process crashes or anomalous child-process spawning after registration.
  • Track Sysgauge vendor advisories for an official patched build and document remediation status.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-120: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2018-25307 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.6 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
3Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.6CVSS 4.0HighCVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:NPrimary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

8.6High
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2018-25307Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
SysgaugeSysGauge Pro4.6.12Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-120 · source CWE mapping

Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow')

Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.