LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2018-25262: Angry IP Scanner for Linux 3.5.3 Denial of Service

Angry IP Scanner for Linux 3.5.3 contains a denial of service vulnerability that allows local attackers to crash the application by supplying malformed input to the port selection field. Attackers can craft a malicious string containing buffer overflow patterns and paste it into the Preferences Ports tab to trigger an application crash.

MediumCVSS 6.9Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2018-25262 affects Angry IP Scanner for Linux 3.5.3. A local attacker can crash the application by entering malformed data in the port selection preferences field. This is an availability issue for the tool itself, not evidence of system takeover or data theft.

Executive priority

Treat this as a moderate operational risk. It can disrupt use of a network scanning tool but does not indicate remote compromise or data exposure from the provided evidence. Prioritize remediation where the tool is used on shared workstations, jump boxes, or analyst systems.

Technical view

The vulnerability is described as a denial of service caused by malformed input to the Preferences Ports tab in Angry IP Scanner for Linux 3.5.3. The record maps it to CWE-787 and CVSS 4.0 score 6.9. Public references include an ExploitDB entry, but no KEV listing or confirmed active exploitation is provided.

Likely exposure

Exposure is likely limited to Linux systems running Angry IP Scanner 3.5.3 where an attacker can interact with the local application or influence input pasted into its preferences.

Exploitation context

The cited description requires malformed input supplied to a local application field. Public exploit material exists, but the provided sources do not show active exploitation in the wild.

Researcher notes

Evidence is narrow: one affected version, local application crash, and public exploit reference. The source bundle does not identify a fixed version, patch commit, or active exploitation. Validate scope carefully before broad conclusions.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory Linux hosts for Angry IP Scanner 3.5.3.
  • Check the official project site and vendor guidance for updated releases or advisories.
  • Limit local access to systems running the affected application.
  • Avoid pasting untrusted port-selection strings into the Preferences Ports tab.
  • Remove the tool where it is not operationally required.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm installed Angry IP Scanner version on Linux endpoints.
  • Review software inventory, package records, or endpoint telemetry for version 3.5.3.
  • Verify whether users with local access can launch the application.
  • Check whether compensating controls restrict local interactive use.
  • Document remediation status against vendor guidance once identified.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-787: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2018-25262 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
6.9 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
4Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
6.9CVSS 4.0MediumCVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:NPrimary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

6.9Medium
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2018-25262Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
AngryipAngry IP Scanner for Linux3.5.3Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-787 · source CWE mapping

Out-of-bounds Write

Out-of-bounds Write represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.