LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2018-25234: SmartFTP Client 9.0.2615.0 Denial of Service via Host Field

SmartFTP Client 9.0.2615.0 contains a denial of service vulnerability that allows local attackers to crash the application by supplying an excessively long string in the Host field. Attackers can paste a buffer of 300 repeated characters into the Host connection parameter to trigger an application crash.

MediumCVSS 6.9Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

SmartFTP Client 9.0.2615.0 can be crashed through an oversized Host field in its connection settings. This is a local denial-of-service issue: it affects availability of the client application, not server systems or data confidentiality. Business urgency is limited unless the vulnerable client is used in critical workflows.

Executive priority

Treat as a targeted endpoint availability issue, not an enterprise-wide remote compromise risk. Prioritize remediation where SmartFTP Client 9.0.2615.0 supports critical operations or is installed on shared workstations.

Technical view

The reported flaw affects SmartFTP Client 9.0.2615.0 and is classified as CWE-466. The CVSS 4.0 vector indicates local attack, low complexity, no privileges, and high impact to vulnerable application availability. Public references include a third-party advisory and ExploitDB entry, but the provided sources do not identify a vendor patch status.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to endpoints running SmartFTP Client 9.0.2615.0. Systems without this client, or running other versions not named in the sources, are not confirmed affected by the provided evidence.

Exploitation context

The issue requires local interaction with the SmartFTP client interface. A public ExploitDB reference exists, but the source bundle does not show active exploitation, and the CVE is not marked as KEV.

Researcher notes

The public record describes an application crash via malformed Host input. Avoid assuming broader memory corruption or remote impact without more evidence. Patch status is not established in the provided sources; validation should focus on version identification and vendor guidance.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory endpoints for SmartFTP Client 9.0.2615.0.
  • Check SmartFTP vendor guidance and download pages for current supported versions.
  • Upgrade or remove the affected client where operationally feasible.
  • Restrict use of the vulnerable client on shared or high-importance workstations.
  • Monitor vendor and CVE records for patch or advisory updates.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm installed SmartFTP Client versions through software inventory.
  • Prioritize hosts running version 9.0.2615.0.
  • Review whether SmartFTP supports business-critical file transfer workflows.
  • Check vendor pages for newer supported releases or remediation notes.
  • Document exceptions where upgrade or removal is not immediately possible.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
6

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-466: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2018-25234 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
6.9 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
5Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
6.9CVSS 4.0MediumCVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:NPrimary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

6.9Medium
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2018-25234Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
SmartftpSmartFTP Client9.0.2615.0Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-466 · source CWE mapping

Return of Pointer Value Outside of Expected Range

Return of Pointer Value Outside of Expected Range represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.