LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2018-25112: PHOENIX CONTACT: ILC 1x1 ETH Denial of Service

An unauthenticated remote attacker may use an uncontrolled resource consumption in the IEC 61131 program of the affected products by creating large amounts of network traffic that needs to be handled by the ILC. This results in a Denial-of-Service of the device.

HighCVSS 7.5Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

Certain PHOENIX CONTACT ILC controllers can be knocked offline by unauthenticated network traffic. The reported impact is loss of device availability, not data theft or code execution. For businesses using these controllers in OT environments, the urgency depends on whether the devices are reachable from untrusted or poorly segmented networks.

Executive priority

Treat this as high priority for sites where affected ILC controllers support production, safety-adjacent, or availability-critical operations. Prioritize segmentation and vendor guidance review before routine maintenance windows.

Technical view

CVE-2018-25112 is a CWE-770 uncontrolled resource consumption issue in the IEC 61131 program handling of affected ILC devices. A remote unauthenticated attacker can generate large volumes of network traffic that the ILC must process, causing denial of service. CVSS 3.1 is 7.5 with network, low-complexity, no-privilege, no-user-interaction characteristics.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely where PHOENIX CONTACT ILC 131, ILC 151, ILC 171, or ILC 191 ETH devices are reachable from enterprise, vendor, or external networks. Evidence provided does not identify internet exposure prevalence.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not report active exploitation, and the CVE is not marked KEV. The vulnerability is still operationally important because exploitation requires only network access and targets availability of industrial controller devices.

Researcher notes

Sources identify a resource-consumption denial-of-service condition, but do not provide patch details in the supplied bundle. Avoid assuming code execution, data compromise, or active exploitation. Validation should focus on asset presence, reachability, and operational dependency.

Mitigation direction

  • Check the CERT@VDE vendor advisory for supported remediation guidance.
  • Inventory affected PHOENIX CONTACT ILC models in OT environments.
  • Restrict access to ILC devices from untrusted networks.
  • Segment OT controller networks from enterprise and external access.
  • Monitor for abnormal traffic volumes toward affected controllers.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether listed ILC models exist in the environment.
  • Map which networks can reach each affected controller.
  • Review device and network logs for traffic spikes or DoS symptoms.
  • Compare deployed products and versions against vendor advisory scope.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-770: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2018-25112 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7.5 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
7.5CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H3.93.6Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

7.5High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2018-25112Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
PHOENIX CONTACTILC 131vers:all/*unaffected
PHOENIX CONTACTILC 151vers:all/*unaffected
PHOENIX CONTACTILC 171vers:all/*unaffected
PHOENIX CONTACTILC 191 ETHvers:all/*unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.