Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
DiliCMS 2.4.0 has a CSRF issue in administrative delete actions. If an administrator is tricked into making an unintended request while logged in, users or groups could be deleted. The sources do not provide CVSS scoring, patch details, or evidence of active exploitation.
Executive priority
Treat this as a targeted CMS administration risk, not a confirmed internet-wide emergency. Prioritize if DiliCMS 2.4.0 manages important public sites or admin access is broadly reachable.
Technical view
The CVE describes missing or insufficient CSRF protection around DiliCMS 2.4.0 administrative user and role deletion URIs. The vulnerable behavior is limited in the public sources to deleting a user or group. No CWE, CVSS vector, affected CPE, or fixed version is provided.
Likely exposure
Exposure is most likely for organizations still running DiliCMS 2.4.0 with reachable administrative interfaces and active administrator browser sessions. Evidence for other versions is not provided.
Exploitation context
The public record describes CSRF against admin delete functionality. CISA KEV is false in the supplied bundle, and no cited source states active exploitation or public weaponization.
Researcher notes
The source data is sparse: one CVE description and a GitHub issue reference. Avoid expanding affected versions or claiming a fix without project confirmation. Focus validation on CSRF controls for state-changing admin routes and deletion audit evidence.
Mitigation direction
- Check DiliCMS vendor or project guidance for a fixed release or official workaround.
- Restrict administrative interface access to trusted networks or VPN where feasible.
- Require administrators to use separate hardened browsers for CMS administration.
- Review CSRF protections on administrative state-changing requests.
- Back up user and role data before remediation work.
Validation and detection
- Inventory DiliCMS deployments and confirm whether version 2.4.0 is present.
- Verify administrative delete actions require CSRF tokens or equivalent protections.
- Review logs for unexpected user or role deletion events.
- Check whether the GitHub issue or project history identifies a fixed commit or release.
- Confirm administrative interfaces are not broadly internet-exposed.
Public sources used
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
CVE-2018-19291 mapping review
Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.
Open ATT&CK lookup- Severity
- Unknown
- CVSS
- Not scored
- Known Exploited
- No
- Published
CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
CVSS and timeline data
No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.
Source materials
- CVE List V5 sourceCVE List V5
- https://github.com/chekun/DiliCMS/issues/60CVE reference · x_refsource_MISC
Products and packages named in the record
CWE details
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.