LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2018-18748: Sandboxie 5.26 allows a Sandbox Escape via an "import os" statement, followed by os.system("cmd") or os.sys...

Sandboxie 5.26 allows a Sandbox Escape via an "import os" statement, followed by os.system("cmd") or os.system("powershell"), within a .py file. NOTE: the vendor disputes this issue because the observed behavior is consistent with the product's intended functionality

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysisunknown

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2018-18748 is a disputed report about Sandboxie 5.26 where a Python file could launch a system shell from inside the sandbox. The vendor disputes the issue, saying the observed behavior matches intended product functionality. No CVSS score, CWE, patch, or confirmed active exploitation is provided in the source bundle.

Executive priority

Prioritize as a validation issue, not an emergency, unless Sandboxie 5.26 protects high-risk untrusted-code workflows. The key business question is whether the organization depends on this product as a primary isolation boundary.

Technical view

The report describes a Sandboxie 5.26 sandbox-escape claim involving Python invoking operating-system process execution. CVE metadata lists affected vendor and product as n/a and notes vendor dispute. There is no CVSS vector, CWE mapping, KEV listing, or vendor remediation detail in the provided sources.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most plausible where Sandboxie 5.26 is used as a hard containment boundary for untrusted Python or script execution. The official affected-product metadata is incomplete, so organizations should verify actual Sandboxie versions and use cases before assigning risk.

Exploitation context

A public GitHub reference is listed, but the source bundle does not show active exploitation, KEV inclusion, or confirmed weaponized use. Treat this as a disputed containment-boundary concern, not as a confirmed widespread exploited vulnerability.

Researcher notes

Evidence is limited and disputed. The CVE description names Sandboxie 5.26, but structured affected-product fields are n/a. Avoid overstating exploitability or remediation. Focus validation on containment expectations, local workflow design, and whether vendor documentation supports the observed behavior.

Mitigation direction

  • Check current vendor guidance for Sandboxie behavior and supported versions.
  • Do not treat Sandboxie 5.26 as the only control for untrusted scripts.
  • Restrict untrusted script execution until containment assumptions are validated.
  • Document business workflows that depend on Sandboxie as a security boundary.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory systems using Sandboxie, especially version 5.26.
  • Confirm whether Python or script execution occurs inside Sandboxie workflows.
  • Review whether Sandboxie is relied on for malware or untrusted-code containment.
  • Record vendor-dispute status and absence of published CVSS in risk notes.
Prepared
Confidence
low
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

description · low confidence lookup

Privilege behavior lookup

The CVE wording references privilege impact, so privilege escalation and authorization behavior review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2018-18748 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.