LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2018-18558: An issue was discovered in Espressif ESP-IDF 2.x and 3.x before 3.0.6 and 3.1.x before 3.1.1.

An issue was discovered in Espressif ESP-IDF 2.x and 3.x before 3.0.6 and 3.1.x before 3.1.1. Insufficient validation of input data in the 2nd stage bootloader allows a physically proximate attacker to bypass secure boot checks and execute arbitrary code, by crafting an application binary that overwrites a bootloader code segment in process_segment in components/bootloader_support/src/esp_image_format.c. The attack is effective when the flash encryption feature is not enabled, or if the attacker finds a different vulnerability that allows them to write this binary to flash memory.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2018-18558 lets a physically nearby attacker bypass ESP32 secure boot protections in affected Espressif ESP-IDF versions and run unauthorized code. The main business concern is device trust: products relying on secure boot could be tampered with if flash encryption is absent or flash can otherwise be written.

Executive priority

Prioritize remediation for fielded or customer-facing devices that rely on secure boot for trust. The issue is not presented as remotely exploited, but it weakens a core hardware-rooted protection and can affect product integrity, warranty, compliance, and incident response if physical tampering is plausible.

Technical view

Affected ESP-IDF 2.x and 3.x before 3.0.6, and 3.1.x before 3.1.1, insufficiently validate input in the second-stage bootloader. A crafted application binary can overwrite a bootloader code segment during process_segment in esp_image_format.c, bypassing secure boot checks and enabling arbitrary code execution under stated conditions.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely in ESP32 products built with affected ESP-IDF branches, using secure boot, and deployed where attackers can gain physical proximity. Risk is higher when flash encryption is not enabled or another weakness allows writing attacker-controlled application binaries to flash.

Exploitation context

The bundle does not cite active exploitation, and KEV status is false. The described attacker needs physical proximity plus a viable path to place a crafted application binary in flash. This is more relevant to device tampering, supply-chain handling, repair channels, and field-deployed hardware than remote-only attacks.

Researcher notes

Key evidence is the CVE description and Espressif references. The bundle lacks CVSS, CWE, detailed product CPEs, and exploit reports. Treat affected-version identification and device configuration review as the first validation tasks, then confirm fixes against Espressif’s advisory and release history.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade affected ESP-IDF 2.x/3.x builds to fixed vendor releases or later.
  • Review Espressif’s advisory and release notes for product-specific secure boot guidance.
  • Enable flash encryption where supported and appropriate for the device lifecycle.
  • Restrict physical access and trusted update paths for deployed devices.
  • Assess whether any separate flaw permits unauthorized flash writes.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory products and firmware builds using Espressif ESP-IDF 2.x or 3.x.
  • Confirm whether builds are before 3.0.6 or 3.1.1.
  • Check secure boot and flash encryption configuration for affected devices.
  • Review manufacturing, update, and service workflows for flash write exposure.
  • Verify remediation against Espressif release notes and advisory guidance.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2018-18558 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
3Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.