LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2018-15401: Cisco Hosted Collaboration Mediation Fulfillment Cross-Site Request Forgery Vulnerability

A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Hosted Collaboration Mediation Fulfillment could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack and perform arbitrary actions on an affected system. The vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections for the web-based management interface. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user of the interface to follow a malicious link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions on an affected system via a web browser and with the privileges of the user.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This flaw affects Cisco Hosted Collaboration Mediation Fulfillment's web management interface. A remote attacker could trick an interface user into opening a malicious link, causing actions to run with that user's privileges. The sources do not provide CVSS, affected version detail, or confirmed fixed releases in the supplied bundle.

Executive priority

Treat this as a targeted management-plane risk. It is not documented here as actively exploited, but successful abuse could let an attacker perform administrative actions through a trusted user's browser session.

Technical view

CVE-2018-15401 is a CWE-352 CSRF issue caused by insufficient CSRF protections in the Cisco Hosted Collaboration Mediation Fulfillment web-based management interface. Exploitation requires user interaction and abuses the victim user's browser session to perform arbitrary management actions with that user's privileges.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to organizations running Cisco Hosted Collaboration Mediation Fulfillment, especially where administrative users can access the management interface from browsers that also receive external links. The supplied data lists affected versions as n/a, so version-specific exposure cannot be confirmed from this bundle.

Exploitation context

The bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or other evidence of active exploitation. The described attack is unauthenticated from the attacker's perspective but depends on persuading a legitimate interface user to follow a malicious link.

Researcher notes

Key gaps are missing CVSS data, affected version granularity, and fix details in the supplied bundle. Do not assume exploit activity or exact remediation beyond Cisco's advisory. Validation should focus on deployment presence, interface reachability, and administrator exposure to untrusted links.

Mitigation direction

  • Review Cisco's advisory for supported fixes, upgrades, or workarounds.
  • Restrict management interface access to trusted administrative networks where feasible.
  • Warn administrators against opening untrusted links while authenticated to management tools.
  • Prioritize remediation for internet-adjacent or broadly reachable management deployments.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Cisco Hosted Collaboration Mediation Fulfillment deployments and owners.
  • Confirm whether any deployment matches Cisco advisory applicability.
  • Check whether management interface access is limited to trusted networks.
  • Review administrative accounts with access to the affected interface.
  • Track remediation status against Cisco's published guidance.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-352: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2018-15401 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
CiscoCisco Hosted Collaboration Mediation Fulfillmentn/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-352 · source CWE mapping

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.