LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2018-13083: The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Plaza Token (PLAZA), an Ethereum token, has a...

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Plaza Token (PLAZA), an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Discuss exposureBack to CVEs
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2018-13083 is an integer overflow in the Plaza Token mintToken function. The cited CVE description says the contract owner can set any user's token balance to any value. This is mainly a token-integrity and trust risk, not a general server compromise.

Executive priority

Treat this as a targeted blockchain asset-integrity issue. It is not broad enterprise exposure, but it can matter if the organization holds, lists, or processes PLAZA. Prioritize validation if PLAZA has business, treasury, customer, or exchange relevance.

Technical view

The issue affects a smart contract implementation for Plaza Token (PLAZA), an Ethereum token. The vulnerable mintToken function has integer overflow behavior that permits the contract owner to assign arbitrary balances. The source bundle does not provide CVSS, CWE, affected version metadata, exploit evidence, or a vendor patch reference.

Likely exposure

Exposure appears limited to parties holding, listing, integrating, or otherwise relying on the affected Plaza Token smart contract implementation. The CVE record does not identify conventional vendor/product versions or CPEs.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not show active exploitation, and KEV status is false. The described abuse path is owner-controlled, so practical risk depends on contract ownership, owner-key security, and whether businesses rely on PLAZA balances for value, accounting, or exchange operations.

Researcher notes

Evidence is sparse. The CVE text identifies integer overflow in mintToken and arbitrary balance assignment by the owner, but does not include CVSS, CWE, affected versions, remediation, or exploitation evidence. Avoid broad conclusions beyond the named Plaza Token implementation.

Mitigation direction

  • Check the referenced Plaza Token analysis and CVE record for contract-specific guidance.
  • Do not rely on affected PLAZA balances for high-value business decisions without review.
  • Assess whether any wallet, exchange, or accounting process still references PLAZA.
  • If still exposed, consult vendor, maintainer, or contract-owner guidance before taking action.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory systems, wallets, and exchange integrations for PLAZA dependencies.
  • Confirm the exact contract implementation used by any PLAZA-related process.
  • Review minting and ownership history for unexplained balance changes.
  • Document whether the organization holds, lists, or accepts PLAZA.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Public sources used

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

description · low confidence lookup

Credential and access behavior lookup

The CVE wording references authentication or credential exposure, so valid-account and credential-access review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2018-13083 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.