LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2018-13069: The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for DYchain (DYC), an Ethereum token, has an inte...

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for DYchain (DYC), an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2018-13069 describes an integer overflow in the mintToken function of a DYchain Ethereum token smart contract. The reported effect is balance integrity failure: the contract owner can set an arbitrary user's balance to any value.

Executive priority

Treat this as a targeted token-integrity issue, not a general enterprise software exposure. Prioritize action if your business holds, lists, prices, or reconciles DYC balances.

Technical view

The public record attributes the issue to the DYC mintToken implementation. Arithmetic overflow in token minting can corrupt balances, but the CVE description states the capability is available to the contract owner. No CVSS, CWE, patch, or vendor/product metadata is provided.

Likely exposure

Exposure appears limited to parties holding, listing, integrating, or accounting for the referenced DYchain DYC Ethereum token contract. The source bundle does not identify broader affected products, package versions, or CPEs.

Exploitation context

The bundle does not show active exploitation, and the CVE is not marked KEV. The described abuse path depends on owner-level contract access, so the main risk is token supply and balance manipulation by a privileged actor or compromised owner account.

Researcher notes

Evidence is sparse: the CVE record gives the core condition and impact but no CVSS, CWE, fixed version, deployment address, or independent exploitation report. Analysis should stay tied to the referenced contract implementation.

Mitigation direction

  • Check the DYC project or contract maintainer for authoritative remediation guidance.
  • Avoid relying on affected token balances until contract integrity is validated.
  • For listings or custody, assess whether trading or deposits should be restricted.
  • Review whether migration to a corrected contract is available from maintainers.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether your organization holds, lists, or integrates DYchain DYC.
  • Compare the deployed contract source with the referenced DYC implementation.
  • Review mintToken arithmetic and owner-only access controls for overflow risk.
  • Check historical mint and balance changes for unexplained anomalies.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

description · low confidence lookup

Credential and access behavior lookup

The CVE wording references authentication or credential exposure, so valid-account and credential-access review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2018-13069 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.