LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2018-1273: Spring Data Commons, versions prior to 1.13 to 1.13.10, 2.0 to 2.0.5, and older unsupported versions, conta...

Spring Data Commons, versions prior to 1.13 to 1.13.10, 2.0 to 2.0.5, and older unsupported versions, contain a property binder vulnerability caused by improper neutralization of special elements. An unauthenticated remote malicious user (or attacker) can supply specially crafted request parameters against Spring Data REST backed HTTP resources or using Spring Data's projection-based request payload binding hat can lead to a remote code execution attack.

CriticalCVSS 9.8Known exploitedUpdated
Glexia's TakeSource changedcritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

A flaw in vulnerable Spring Data Commons property binding can let a remote, unauthenticated attacker execute code through certain HTTP request handling paths. Successful exploitation could compromise application data, integrity, and availability. CISA lists this CVE as known exploited, making exposed legacy deployments an urgent concern.

Executive priority

Treat confirmed exposed instances as immediate remediation work because exploitation is documented and successful attacks can produce full application compromise. Rapidly inventory internet-facing services first, then internal and unsupported systems. Do not treat perimeter controls as a substitute for upgrading.

Technical view

Improper neutralization of special elements in the Spring Data Commons property binder enables crafted parameters to reach code-execution behavior. Relevant paths include Spring Data REST-backed HTTP resources and projection-based request payload binding. The supplied record lists affected 1.13.x through 1.13.10, 2.0.x through 2.0.5, and older unsupported versions.

Likely exposure

Highest risk exists where an application uses a listed Spring Data Commons version and exposes affected Spring Data REST resources or projection-based binding to untrusted requests. Dependency presence alone does not prove reachability. Transitive dependencies and unsupported applications may obscure vulnerable versions.

Exploitation context

CISA KEV status supports known exploitation in the wild. The bundle provides no details about observed campaigns, targets, exploit reliability, or current exploitation volume. The CVSS 9.8 vector indicates network reachability, low complexity, no required privileges, and no user interaction.

Researcher notes

The bundle inconsistently labels the product as Spring Framework while its description identifies Spring Data Commons. Its version wording is also malformed, so confirm exact applicability and fixed releases against current vendor guidance. KEV establishes exploitation status but does not establish exploitation of any specific organization.

Mitigation direction

  • Identify and prioritize internet-facing applications using affected Spring Data Commons versions.
  • Upgrade according to current Spring vendor guidance; the supplied bundle does not name fixed versions.
  • Replace older unsupported releases with a vendor-supported version.
  • Until upgraded, restrict untrusted access to affected HTTP resources and binding paths.
  • Check applicable Oracle guidance where Spring Data Commons is embedded in Oracle products.

Validation and detection

  • Resolve effective Spring Data Commons versions, including transitive dependencies, across deployed applications.
  • Identify Spring Data REST-backed resources and projection-based request payload binding.
  • Confirm whether affected paths accept requests from unauthenticated or otherwise untrusted clients.
  • Verify upgraded deployments no longer contain versions listed as affected.
  • Review application, gateway, and endpoint telemetry for suspicious requests without attempting exploitation.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
5

The source record changed after analysis: Material source record changed after analysis.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-94: Code execution behavior lookup

Code execution and unsafe deserialization weaknesses often justify reviewing execution behavior and process telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2018-1273 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9.8 (3.1)
Known Exploited
Yes
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
5Timeline events
2ADP providers
4Source links

CISA KEV status

Status
Known exploited
Source
CISA-ADP
Date added
KEV reference

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: activeAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9.8CVSS 3.1CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H3.95.9CISA-ADP

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

9.8Critical
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2018-1273Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. Added to KEVCISA-ADP

    CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities metadata lists this CVE as known exploited.

  4. ADP timelineCISA-ADP

    CVE-2018-1273 added to CISA KEV

  5. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CVECVE Program Container
CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
cvssV3_1other:ssvcother:kev
  • 2022-03-25T00:00:00.000Z: CVE-2018-1273 added to CISA KEV

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
Spring by PivotalSpring FrameworkVersions prior to 1.13 to 1.13.10, 2.0 to 2.0.5, and older unsupported versionsListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-94 · source CWE mapping

Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')

Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.