Security readout for executives and security teams
Spring Batch Admin lacks protection against cross-site request forgery. If an administrator is signed in and visits a malicious website, that site could cause the admin’s browser to send unwanted requests to Spring Batch Admin. The product is end of life, and the source says this issue was not patched. Exposure is most likely in legacy environments still running Spring Batch Admin, especially where the admin interface is reachable from user workstations or external networks. The source bundle identifies all versions as affected but provides no CPEs, CVSS score, or deployment prevalence. Treat this as a legacy platform risk rather than a routine patch item. Because all versions are affected and unpatched, the business decision is whether Spring Batch Admin can be retired, isolated, or replaced with a supported workflow. Mitigation focus: Identify any Spring Batch Admin deployments and owners.; Prioritize retirement or migration from this EOL product.; Restrict Spring Batch Admin access to trusted networks or VPNs..
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
CWE-352: User-session and phishing behavior lookup
Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
Open ATT&CK lookupCVE-2018-1230 mapping review
Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.
Open ATT&CK lookup- Severity
- Unknown
- CVSS
- Not scored
- Known Exploited
- No
- Published
CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
CVSS and timeline data
No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.
Source materials
- CVE List V5 sourceCVE List V5
- https://pivotal.io/security/cve-2018-1230CVE reference · x_refsource_CONFIRM
Products and packages named in the record
CWE details
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.